The Generation War

Right now, there’s a huge war going on, but it’s not a physical one being waged. It really isn’t class structure either, although part of it involves classes. The war being waged is a generation one where there’s a lot of older views that are conflicting with the way the world is evolving. This isn’t to say that it’s just old people vs young people. Instead, the situation is which side of the equation you belong to.

When I look at the Occupy Wallstreet movement and see the political battle being waged over SOPA, I feel as though at first what seems to be going on is class warfare. Essentially, the have’s vs have-not’s. But not every powerful person or group are necessarily on one side or the other. For instance, in the situation with SOPA, you have numerous major internet companies (such as Google) fighting against SOPA, which is heavily supported by Big Media. In the case of Occupy Wallstreet, you have some famous people lending support and their voices to the cause (I’ll name Rowdy Piper as one person as he mentioned it in his tweet).

And the chaos isn’t just in the states. Britain, Egypt, Libya, Greece and Italy all have shown internal turmoil. Sometimes it’s a matter of economics. But on many occasions you’ll also see that it’s the young people who seem to be the most vocal in many of these situations.

This has led me to ask why this all is. I think part of the issue is that the internet has been able to spawn a new era of consciousness in the world where countries, people and cultures no longer are isolated as heavily as before. The internet with services such as youtube, Facebook, Twitter, blogging, wireless networks, cellphones, peer-to-peer networks, etc. have created methods to share information freely that has disrupted governments, industries, cultures and ways of thinking at a pace like no other in history. We, as a species, are more connected and bound to each other in some way because of how information now can be delivered in mere milliseconds once something occurs.

The problem I see is that the people who have been able to adjust and embrace these technologies are the ones who are reaping the most benefit while the others have been horridly slow to accept this new way of thinking and handling things. This is why it’s not necessarily an age issue. I work with older people who manage to keep up and even have a wonderful vision of how technology can be utilized. At the same time, I know people who are younger than me in other countries who distance themselves away from technologies either out of fear, lack of knowledge or laziness to adopt it.

That said, no matter how much the people who refuse to accept this new era of thinking remonstrate, things have changed and cannot revert to whatever format they’re used to. Even if legally they gain small victories, the number of people who have embraced and wholeheartedly accepted into their lives the technology and ways of thinking aren’t going to disappear in a day.

The people in charge are losing and will eventually lose because I truly believe that this new era of thinking already has penetrated with their children. Those that control the older mode of thinking, imo, are fewer. Even if they are able to indoctrinate their children with similar thinking, those numbers will likewise be fewer. As a result, the real issue to me is just figuring out how to deal with these people who consistently blockage progress. All I can say to that is just look towards Libya, Greece, Italy and Egypt to see how their people have responded. Is America next on that list?

How You Can Contribute To Prevent SOPA

The big controversy in congress is about the SOPA (Stop Online Piracy Act). The thing is that the primary supporters for this bill are Big Media. In my opinion, this is the last desperate attempt by Big Media in their fight against new media (i.e. the internet) by giving the government and themselves the ability to essentially shut down the internet. Without a doubt the ramifications for this act is huge, including unprecedented control without democratic input for a few select, the potential for the equivalent of the Great Firewall of China to be brought here to America (something Hillary Clinton and others had protested while on their foreign trips to China, etc.), the massive loss of jobs, economic downturn and essentially setting us back to the 80’s (or worse).

Obviously, this is NOT a good thing if we want to protect one of the greatest innovations in current times and one of the last bastions of freedom on earth.

If this passes, then there’s some ways to help prevent or fight the ramifications and here’s some suggestions:

  • Refuse to vote for any member of Congress/Senate that support this legislation and tell them straight out that you refuse to support someone who refuses democracy in favor of corporate lobbyists.
  • Demand the government to put stricter limits on corporate lobbyists.
  • Support internet companies fighting for the bill.
  • If you are an internet company, band together with other companies because THIS IS YOUR LIVELIHOOD.
  • If you are an internet company, refuse to support the companies who support this bill by pulling the plug on them, charging higher fees and doing everything in your power to make Big Media companies suffer.
  • Create a new internet that isn’t controlled by a single entity using a peer-to-peer wireless network that is completely open and secure such that it cannot be cracked nor sniffed by any technology
  • For everyone, stop buying products from Big Media. This includes movies, music, books, magazines and halting watching any form of television.
  • Support independents exclusively.
  • Make your friends, family and associates aware of what the Big Media is about.
  • Stop paying for cable TV, etc.

The thing about Big Media and these traditional companies is that their ways of doing things are archaic and dying because of the threat of New Media. However, these companies refuse to give up because they are addicted to power. These companies are horribly sick and corrupt though. Ever hear about how they treat everyone on the lower rungs? Unless you’re the crop on top, you’re basically a slave to these people. Or watch how these people force their workers into doing drugs and getting into illegal things to the point where their lives are all fucked up. Don’t believe me? Look at what happened to the singer from Alice in Chains. Or Motley Crue. Or the so-called artists in Japan who have to prostitute themselves just to make it. The list is endless.

Supporting this trade is supporting immorality. Just like the fast food industry, Big Media is completely unnecessary but people have become too dependent upon them because of how they’ve been brain washed. But you have an ultimate choice. The choice should be to kill this industry and let it start up with a clean slate.

Tempest Keep First Try

After reading that Tempest Keep was doable solo, I decided to give it a shot with my two friends. First note: LOTS OF GOLD DROP. Great place to farm if you want to do something outside of Heroics and Cataclysm raids with just a few friends. I think you probably need between 4-5 people, at least for the last fight. Up until that point, the boss fights were fairly reasonable. We haven’t downed the last boss yet, but I hope to finish it up tomorrow night.

Another great reason to farm this is just for tier gear in preparation for the upcoming Transmogrification feature  for patch 4.3. So far I’ve managed to get a few tier pieces.  Of course, one of the best reasons to go is for the mount. With the low drop rate, you have several excellent reasons to asks others to come with you.

Beyond that, I think going for both personal and guild achievements are excellent reasons to bring people here. I don’t think you need that many if you have a bunch of 85’s, but just enough to DPS things down. At least, one tank and a healer (hopefully a shaman) to help you during some of the CC moments.

Finally, a great reason to do this is that it’s a good chance for your guild to practice as a team and get used to each other. My guild at the moment has mostly soloist who quests. They might do the occasional random or battleground. I’m certain though that people would love to try new things if presented with the opportunity.

Making Progression With My Warrior

Since this weekend was rather slow in terms of people being on, I decided for the most part to push my warrior finally. I finally managed to get her over the hump of level 60 with some power leveling help from a few friends. Once she hit 62 though, I took her to Zangarmarsh to propel her forward on my own. I find levels 60-62 to be a pain because of the way Hellfire Peninsula was constructed. So it’s better if you have some higher level friends to give you some help in leveling you and just skip the vast majority of the region.

I managed to get her two levels in the marsh and decided to do something different for once. So this time around, I started in Terokkar Forest rather than going straight into Nagrand. I gained two levels and then moved her to my usual spot of Nagrand. Right now, she’s sitting at level 67 and just questing to get her ready for Northrend.

Thus far, the questing gear I’ve been finding hasn’t been that great for her. She still is using old gear from pre-BC zones. I think that may just be a consequence of skipping  over Hellfire Peninsula entirely. Lucky for her, she’s equipped with a few BoA pieces (chest, sword, shoulders and cloak) so I don’t  have to worry about that type of gear. On the bright side, I’ve been able to make some money with her because the quest rewards have mostly been stuff she already has.

Tomorrow, I hope to finish  up with Outlands and move her to Northrend. As I level her, I’m also splitting time for her professions. She’s the last toon who has a profession I haven’t already maxed out yet. Meaning that all the major professions minus engineering for me have been maxed out thus far. This will be good for me because I do miss Northrend.

Probably, I should get back to finishing up my other toons. However, I’m somewhat bored of doing the limited number of Cataclysm quests. Perhaps, when she reaches 80 or so, I’ll switch to another toon and do some other quests. Down the line, I’d like to get back to leveling my mage and rogue. But that might be in a month or two

Why Dailies *ARE* A Good Game Mechanic in World of Warcraft

There was an interesting topic on the Blizzard discussion boards that I could not post to since the limit was reached. However, the original post described dailies as being a poor design to World of Warcraft because “it feels like a job.” While I acknowledge the sentiment, I think that the poster has failed to see what makes the concept of daily quest a great mechanic in WoW.

I think dailies are a great idea for the game. Quite a few RPGs just “end” once you finish all the regular quests and kill the primary opponents. I think the problem with dailies is that there’s not enough of them in terms of current content in order to achieve certain rewards. the Molten Front for the most part is fine, but just takes a while before you can reach your goal. the only downside to the Molten Front is that the gear is limited compared to pure raiding/instancing.

A bigger issue isn’t so much the repetitiveness of dailies but more or less that it becomes one of the only things to do if you’re not a raider (if you want to obtain gear) upon hitting level 85. Also, the rewards really don’t scale after hitting a certain point. lastly, there’s just not that a large enough pool of dailies in these zones so it probably feels boring just doing dailies on 2-3 different areas.

With regards to Cataclysm, I think some of the weaknesses in the daily quest system was a result of the revamping of the pre-Vanilla world. The problem I feel is that so much attention probably was spent focused on streamlining the pre-Vanilla world that not enough time was devoted to the higher level zones. When the Molten Front opened up, it offered some epic quest lines, although grinding to reach towards the end takes a long period (as to compensate for the probable time to get equivalent raid gear).

But I like the idea overall. it’s really a nice, guaranteed method to get money, reputation and eventually more gear. I just wish that each zone had a larger number of quests. For instance, Uldum only provides a measly two quests while Vash’ir has nothing at all.

Second, it would be great not to just have chained quests. I like the idea of quests being loose and optional. Molten Front did a little of both but I wasn’t an entire fan of choosing one line or the other then making it all phased. I liked the Vanilla method of questing where most quests were kill, item loot, find item, etc. I think if the dailies just stick with that it should be fine.

Why Power Leveling and Instance Grinding Isn’t the Best Method for Leveling in WoW

A while back when I was leveling my first few toons on a PVP server, I got into leveling via instance grinding. At first, it was pretty fun because you just had to learn the instance and “go with it.” Sometimes, you met horrible players and other times you met great players. But the thing for me was that I could avoid PVP and just sit around Orgrimmar most of the day while waiting for the instance to queue up.

Later on, when I switched to a PVE server, I decided to start a hunter from scratch just to re-learn how to play after the massive changes to the class. In starting over, I just went questing all the way up to level 60. I found that I leveled somewhat faster than just instance grinding because of the way the quests now were structured. Also, I could avoid asshole players and not have to deal with the waits and wipes of pugs.

But the thing I learned while leveling my hunter and my other toons was that I could learn how to play my class at my own pace. Now, soloing differs greatly compared to raiding and instancing. But sometimes, you can learn just what each little ability is, where it belongs and more importantly when to use it.

Sometime though, a friend and I started to do the Refer-A-Friend thing. Most of the time, we just instance grinded. Because of the experience bonus, we leveled incredibly fast. I had BoAs and received a 5% bonus to experience on top of that from the guild. However, I found that I would skip some abilities and lose out on drops. Sometimes, I would have a crappy piece of gear that was 10 levels old. More than that I missed many opportunities to really learn all the new abilities for my class.

In the case of my shaman, that wasn’t a huge deal in gaining a few levels here and there. I leveled a shaman before and didn’t find it that much different. But for my warlock, it was a huge deal. I haven’t leveled him for a while but am missing quite a bit of gear from the enormous gap from getting free levels from RAF. Also, I feel somewhat off in terms of picking up where I left off. I’m certain that it’ll be a little challenging picking up the class again.

That lead me to realize that just power leveling and instancing grinding potentially are detriments to leveling. Power leveling for certain because you end up not really learning how to play your class and you end up taking things for granted. I had a friend who just wanted me to power level him for SEVERAL levels in a row. He’s not really a great player to begin with and incredibly lazy. But just having me power level him makes him lazier and a worse player.

Then the whole instance grinding thing really isn’t that fun in the end. It feels really repetitive and you end up missing out on a lot of content if that’s all you do in trying to rush to hit 85. I think starting with WOTLK, instance grinding became tougher because the developers want people to quest to experience the world. And it’s been stated for a while that questing really is the best way to level. Coming up in the next 4.3 patch, questing pretty much will be the best way to level hands down with regards to Outlands and Northrend since the experience is being nerfed and that many group quests are being retooled for soloing.

Coming from a PVP realm, I can tell that instance grinding is fine for avoiding world PVP. But I think people end up getting into bad habits and not really mixing things up.

So where does instance grinding and power leveling come into play? I think instances are great for the occasional level and gear upgrades. Maybe if you’re on the border of a level, like 3-4 bars, sticking yourself in an instance would give you that little bonus. Also, it’s good to mix things up since questing too can become monotonous (I’ve leveled 5 toons to 85 thus far).

Power leveling pretty much is similar in this regards except that you’re essentially asking someone to give you a quick boost. If you have a friend who has a higher level toon, then power leveling isn’t so bad once in a while just for a slight, quick edge. Or perhaps you can do power leveling for others to meet people and maybe help build out your guild a little.

Either way, there’s more ways to play the game. But these are just some points to keep in mind, especially if you’re a beginner.

Why Level Caps in Games Sucks

I’ve never been a fan of level caps in RPGs. AD&D had them in many games. If you bought something like the original Pools of Radiance Gold Box edition, you were limited to 8 or so on average. Only by getting the expansions you would be able to receive more levels. The problem I found was that you were perpetually limited by levels in terms of abilities. Of course, if you played any significant amount of AD&D, you’d realize that you can have far more abilities than what these games offered.

The Ultima series also imposed level caps. Once you hit those levels, then you pretty much focused on finishing the game. Similarly though, you would end up picking items and certain characters to optimize your game play. So again you could not avoid the cookie cutter game play.

Looking at World of Warcraft, I’ve come to realize that level caps hurt games because of how you limit abilities. WoW wants to avoid the cookie cutter talent tree feeling by once again re-inventing the talent tree (it’s not even a tree anymore). But you really can’t move away from the cookie cutter aspect simply because there’s an artificial limit imposed that essentially dictates the maximum number of skills/points or whatever one can achieve. After that point, you have no where to go. In the case of WoW, gear upgrades provided through each patch become the only way for measurement of progress in the game (and downing bosses; but that seems more personal than anything since there’s a PVP aspect; also, we’re talking about a reward system that shows character improvement)

One major difference between WoW and these other games I mentioned is that once you purchased an Ultima 4 or a Pool of Darkness, you could play it endlessly, revisit the game, etc. without having to pay additional monthly fees. In other words, you would come to a stopping point. WoW though isn’t something you just “stop.” You can stop paying but if all you want is just to play the game for one week, could you justify reopening an account for that period?

That said, the mentality involved here is that you don’t really want to just “quit” a game like WoW. However, you do want to feel like you’re making head way into the game from a character point of view. In this sense, I really hate the idea of level caps because you feel as though you can’t make progress on the character itself and depend on other means of measurement for feeling the character improves.

Games that avoid this are like Bard’s Tale, Wizardry, Diablo and Might and Magic to name a few. There might be a limit cap, but actually reaching that cap is pretty tough. More importantly though, each level isn’t so significant that it completely unbalances the game. Yet when you receive a level, you’re rewarded with some choice in distributing your points (well, in BT, those points are automatically distributed)

You might argue that some players might just grind all day and night to max out there characters, thereby destroying balance once again. First, there are ways to offset this situation. One is to make leveling really hard by increasing the required amount of XP per level to grow at a steady, but scaled pace. Two, make it so that each level only imparts some enhancements like hit points, spell points, attributes, etc. For PVP, limit it to brackets of levels. For monsters, limit encounters to a range of levels.

The thing about a game like WoW is that only the last level in the game (for that particular expansion) is the only meaningful one. I mean, why even bother having levels when the rest are meaningless? Or why bother having higher levels when the next expansion re-invents them completely?

The arguments the developers make in terms of cookie cutter specs and choices are quite fallacious. IMO, the thing is that they’ve never attempted to differentiate between PVP and PVE clearly to offset the balances imposed by the two. But they will never get around the cookie cutter aspect unless each ability in the talent tree are made equal to some degree. But again, what’s the point if all you’re doing is adding color, time/penalties and other things just to offset each other?

Mist of Panderia Announced at BlizzCon 2011

As anticipated the latest expansion to the World of Warcraft series was announced at BlizzCon 2011 on Friday. My first reaction after seeing the introduction of the Panda (or rather Panderan) race was:


Quite honestly, I thought it was a joke. But alas it’s not April Fools. Even reading the reactions from others, a similar sentiment was shared by the online WoW community. However, even without the details of the expansion, the level of depth in the graphics for the announcement alone should dispel any doubts of the seriousness in Blizzard’s devotion for developing this expansion.

Even if you might think that playing a panda might be a complete joke, if you examined the hints of the new world, you could not help but be impressed by the new art and possibilities for this expansion. I’ve always wanted an Asian themed part for WoW and finally we’re getting it.

One of the most interesting aspects of the Panderan race is that players will be able to choose between factions after hitting a certain level. I think I might’ve blogged about the idea in the past because it’s a good one. In my own game, I had a similar idea (I called it “traitors”) but the division gives the game a new dynamic in terms of role playing. Of course, for whatever reason once someone chooses their faction, they no longer will be able to communicate with other Panderans of the opposite faction (which, imo, is horribly stupid from an RPG point of view).

With regards to the Panderan racial traits, the only one that looks promising is the increased length of rest experience. I’m guessing this has been added so that people who want to level a new toon can do so expediently.

Of course, the other big announcement for the expansion is the introduction of the monk class. It’ll play like a druid in that the class will be able to use leather/cloth armor and do multiple roles (tank, DPS and healing). Of course, this deviates from most monk types in other FRPGs where they either use cloth or no armor and gain boosts naturally. I’m assuming that monks will use unarmed combat to some degree as well, but I don’t know how that will play out in terms of gear (this is why it’s stupid to make gear as the thing that scales once a level cap is reached).

My interpretation of the introduction of the Panderan race is that by allowing them to choose between factions, Blizzard could introduce the monk class in a single expansion as well. The good thing is that if you don’t want to play a big fat bear, you still have the option of choosing another race (although goblins and worgen won’t count here) for the monk class.

That does imply that the 10 character per realm limit will need to be addressed. I think in one of the forums or Q/A sessions, the representatives from Blizzard mentioned that what they might do is an account limit on characters. I would love to see this happen because I would some day like to create my alliance toons on my current server. In that manner, I won’t have to transfer one of my toons off to another server just to hand out useless BoAs and gold to fresh level ones.

Another major aspect of the expansion is that the level cap will be raised to 90. Beyond the new talent system (which I will address), I don’t know how this will impact game play. Does the new level cap mean we’ll finally hit one million hit points? Or will we simply double our current hit points? I imagine that our damage will scale up in a similar manner, but this question is important for determining how some of us can handle old content. I know someone already managed to solo the Lich King using a Blood Death Knight. But given five more levels, perhaps that fight could’ve been even easier (reportedly he wiped around 11 times and had a large number of buffs)

Then we come to the Pokemon aspect of the game – that’s right, non-combat pets PVP style! I’m not sure how to interpret this aspect of the game, but it does sound amusing at the very least. Non-combat pets will have levels and limited abilities. I think most pets can be used for this. Awesome. Now, my wind rider cub can shred everyone else up.

Another interesting mechanic in the game will be PVE scenarios. From the sound of it, it kinda feels like Rift where people can join a raid/event. Right now, in the Molten Front dailies, you have a participatory raiding type of situation where people (alliance and horde alike) can help each other defeat foes (mini bosses) for credit towards a quest. I’m guessing that the new PVE scenarios aspect will turn out similar. Another description of this was that it’ll be like a dungeon finder thing minus strict roles. Or maybe another way to describe it is a mini-instance. Larger scenarios will have an epic feel to it and provide greater rewards. I think like the Molten Front, the game will provide dailies that people can choose from leading towards rewards. In this manner, beyond raiding and instance grinding, people can gear up by other means.

Then there’s the dungeon challenge modes. This is actually a GREAT idea because it really is geared towards the hard core types. You’re stripped down to basic gear so there’s no real advantage and must defeat bosses within a certain time limit. The rewards from these challenges are more bling that go hand-in-hand with the transmogrification feature coming in patch 4.3.

I really like this idea because it truly addresses a major complaint that hard core types would rant and rave about in forums. The problem has been that certain content was not accessible by common players but then made too easy later on in WOTLK, thus disappointing the hard core types. With dungeons scaling back their difficulty to WOTLK (supposedly) in Mist of Panderia, you open up a can of worms from the hard core types again. However, the challenge modes offset this and provide the thing that hard core types wanted: some sort of material bragging right in the form of bling. Now, people who want to gear up can gear up and have access to content while the hard core types can sit around in Orgrimmar and feel proud (for whatever ego boosting reason that does).

Now, there’s one issue that I think the vast majority of people will end up despising and that’s the continual revision of the talent system. The new proposed talent system is supposed to eliminate cookie cutter specs by offering only three types of talents per 15 levels.

Hold on a second.

Eliminate cookie cutter types?

Only three choices per three levels?

For a total of 6 choices?

This is supposed to eliminate boring specs!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?

Naturally, the person seemingly in charge of this section is none other than AssCrawler, I mean Ghost Crawler Greg Street. Someone who is notorious known for making many bad decisions in terms of specs (except for Frost Mages because he plays one) as a result of his experience in real time strategy games.

I’ve been extremely vocal about the talent problems on various forums, but I will once again here on my blog spell out the core issue with why the talent system in World of Warcraft is messed up. The chief problem with the talent system in the so-called cookie cutter dilemma is that the game imposes a level cap, which in turn imposes a talent point cap. As a result, players are forced to put points into the trees in a very obvious manner.

The way World of Warcraft handles talents is that they’re treated as a reward system for leveling. Diablo 2 got it right when it came to what a true talent tree is because players could place points into areas they saw fit. The reason why that was allowed was because Diablo 2 had no level restrictions, thus allowing characters to level indefinitely and permit players to put talent points as they saw fit indefinitely.

The new proposed system is basically a dangling carrot system that allows players 6 choices in the span of the characters’ leveling experiences. However, I feel that in order to achieve some form of balance, the three choices at each of these 15 levels will probably have little differentiation between each  other outside of perhaps effects. If that isn’t the case, then these talents will exist on a situational basis, leading once again to the cookie cutter dilemma.

The thing is that you cannot get rid of the cookie cutter dilemma in a game like World of Warcraft where you have so many different variables defining how talent trees and abilities are structured. I personally think that Greg Street is just really lazy and has little to no true experience in RPGs when it comes to this kind of stuff. For him, the developers and QA, it’s just less combination of variables to test.

For the gamer, it’s basically a reduction of  thought and buttons.

The good  thing is that the game is not out yet and that patch 4.3 isn’t even ready. They managed to scrap the Titans-something-or-rather for Cataclysm, so there’s always the hope that this system would be scrapped (or something like a rock falling on Greg Street’s head, an automotive accident, etc.)

What’s my proposal in this? Bring back the old talent tree. The game designers themselves admitted that the revised talent tree in Cataclysm was a failure. Originally, it was supposed to simplify the way players were to make choices in the game so that people would make the so-called “right” choice in defining their tree (which is what lead to the cookie cutter problem in the first place). So narrowing the tree and forcing players to stick with only a single spec until that spec hit a certain number of points would allow new players to learn the game. Second, the choices in the talent specs were to be more “meaningful” and useful as opposed to giving some extra damage, crits, etc. (which it didn’t) Still, this didn’t appease everyone.

Here’s the thing. Bad players are going to be bad players period because they will never do the research to figure out how to play their class. There is very little Blizzard can do to offset this problem, except to create realms based on the ability of the players. You simply have to siphon off the two types in the game to really resolve this conflict of interest.

At the same time, I think the game designers need to re-think what a talent tree really is in conjunction with understanding what an RPG is. What we’re seeing in Greg Street’s world is the de-evolution of an RPG game to something overly simplistic. I mean, why even bother having levels? The content itself isn’t designed to be scaling.

My suggestion is this: go back to the old talent tree. Either increase the depth of the tree or give more points. I like the idea of increasing the amount of points we can spend on multiple trees. I think Cataclysm had great potential in allowing players to expand their own specs. For instance, why not have a combat healer? Or more PVP related talents for a raider?

This is the real problem with the current system. It’s not that the talent trees create cookie cutter specs. It’s that people are forced into cookie cutter roles. And those roles are really just for instances and raids.

However, the way I see it, the idea of the game being socially oriented, while ideal in nature, really isn’t practical. Let’s be honest here; the World of Warcraft community isn’t exactly something you’d tell your friends to aspire towards. Worse yet, supposedly the game has devolved from a community stance since the dungeon finder was introduced.

If that’s the case, maybe Blizzard should start designing the game more for the solo player in mind. From what it looks like, there will be more of it with this expansion. I’m very happy for that. But if people are forced to group, let it be in such a way that the barriers to entry are low.

American Pro-Wrestling and Me

I used to blog quite a bit about the pro-wrestling scene. For over a year now, I’ve pretty much stopped watching all current pro-wrestling. The problem is that I simply dislike the products heavily and find nothing compelling anymore. I do have a few people that I like, but I simply do not want to spend more time watching a product that I’ve lost a great deal of passion for.

I still like pro-wrestling but I’ve pretty much limited myself to older shows from the 80’s, 70’s and some early 90’s. Although I can appreciate the athleticism of the current generation of pro-wrestlers, I feel that the art of pro-wrestling really has been lost. Instead, most people are pretty bland with generic interviews, generic moves and generic grievances. The emotional part of pro-wrestling is pretty much lost on me and I feel as though I no longer am watching a competition nor something where unique characters really have a chance to define themselves.

I think the worst part about the current climate of pro-wrestling is the booking. There’s very few people you can latch onto because the development times are too short and you don’t see the gradual growth of anyone. Probably the only last person that seemed mildly interesting was CM Punk, but the matches are not what I would have liked to have seen in his feuds.

In watching the evolution of pro-wrestling, I think back to some great insight Bobby Heenan had described in a few interviews about the major issues with the industry. The most salient point he made was saying how the people on the inside had screwed  up in allowing the general public to know how their tricks had been done. Although various TV shows had exposed pro-wrestling as being scripted and that the general public pretty much knew this as fact, the big thing was that the people on the inside for the most part continued to guard the tricks in pro-wrestling. With movies like The Wrestler, the Montreal Screw Job and even the little DVD interviews with wrestlers, you pretty much have little left to protect.

At this point, the industry pretty much is nothing more than a live stage show with (disposable) stuntmen. The wrestling itself, while more acrobatic, really isn’t “wrestling” any longer. You don’t see how someone locks on a hold and their opponent figures out  how to reverse it. If the reversal does occur, it’s more like a cliche because there’s little thought really put into how these reversals are done, except on the fanciness of a flip. But none of it looks “realistic” and most matches end up boiling down to a series of trading moves. In fact, if anything pro-wrestling looks more like an arcade game than anything “real.”

I remember watching a youtube video with Al Snow and how he partly blamed Randy Savage vs Ricky Steamboat at Wrestlemania 3 as being part of the slow decline in pro-wrestling in terms of moving from just selling tickets to showmanship. I can partly see where he’s coming from but I don’t really consider that the true precedent. For me it’s just not being able to believe in anything anymore. Even knowing that the pro-wrestling wasn’t real, the draw to me is always the characters, the growth of people and the storylines that make me engage in the wrestlers. The stuff that exist today lack these elements. You don’t have the Roddy Pipers, the Jesse Venturas, Bobby Heenans, Jim Cornettes, Arn Andersons, Tully Blanchards, Ernie Ladds, etc. anymore.

Part of the problem seems to be that the wrestlers aren’t  allowed to control the image they want to present for themselves. I think that element has hurt the industry more than anything and you can definitely blame the WWE on that aspect. When there were more than a single dominant company, one of the fun things to see was when a wrestler jumped ship and seeing how they could survive in the other federation. Like when Ric Flair came to WWE for the first time or Kerry Von Erich challenging Ric Flair for the NWA title or when the Road Warriors entered the NWA.

I write this after reading the recent TNA TV taping results and seeing the most recent PPV. Although by comparison the PPV was one of their better ones, the elements I described above made me glad that I stopped watching. For instance, Hulk Hogan buried Robert Roode and praised James Storm. Next thing you know Robert Roode lost and Storm won the title. I don’t get why Hogan would publicly state these things. It  simply makes TNA look terrible and pretty much spoils the product as well as revealing the obvious bias in booking. But again it goes back to how Heenan mentioned that the people inside the business are the ones destroying it simply because they’re revealing their own tricks. Well, it’s a real shame because this just demonstrates that the posting of results are more important than watching them. So I guess until these elements are fixed, I’ll simply stick to my older pro-wrestling videos.

The Future of Web Technologies

Recently, I’ve been posting to my company’s Yammer feed articles about platforms and software in relation to the web. There’s a lot of validation on what makes some of the top companies big players and I believe the key is in the idea of centering the business as a form of a platform. When you look at some of the most successful web products, they exist because of how pluggable they are into other people’s sites through APIs. Typically, the best ones expose some sort of data centric piece where others can hook into.

However, just having an API doesn’t ensure success. I think one key to these APIs is the amount of data that has been collected through the core application. For instance, reviews from Yelp, the number of coordinates and detail provided through Google Maps, the sheer number of users from Facebook, the massive messaging capacity of Twitter or the various flavors of cloud storage.

Companies possessing a wealth of accumulated data are power brokers in this space since they can charge for the data storage, knowledge possession and network usage. I see this as a mistake in the long term at times, especially if the key to these companies’ business plans are centered around selling data. What’s more important is adoption of these services which should scale from a cost perspective over time. Having a lower barrier to entry allows for quicker adoption, which in turn causes other businesses to become inextricably tied to the company, which, imo is where many of these services are shooting themselves in the foot.

But should the future of web technologies just be in data services? I think that they are just one piece of a larger puzzle. My analogy of the way web technologies should be viewed as is like Lego. In the world of Lego, you have a great number of parts to build your ideal set. The more generic the piece, the greater the utility. Having access to a bucket containing parts from numerous genres ensures the maximum flexibility and creativity for the ideal set.

So what pieces are we missing? I think one major missing structure is the UI/UX components. A lot of what’s available are mostly loose frameworks like a jQuery, Less, or Raphael.js, all of which offer very powerful means to building your technologies. However, these elements are like Lego from the early 80’s, where you had slightly more specific parts that could be interchangeably used between genres.

For the power programmer or business, maybe that’s not powerful enough (e.g. Google). Yet, maybe building that cockpit might require quite a bit of parts when all you really want is to build the front of the airplane. So perhaps from the UI/UX perspective, we need to start looking at the specific case as opposed to the generic case. That might involve the creation of standards (or new standards) and conventions for handling things.

Here’s a few concrete ideas. Some generic layouts. I know there’s a few websites out there that provide these along with color options. But what if there’s a precedence set for the “right way” of doing things for a particular genre for a website? For instance, a standard layout, colors, font types, etc. This “right way” would be the result of the accumulation of knowledge for that particular genre of a site (as an example).

I’ve seen some CMS that provide some flexibility, but in my exposure, they commonly prove to be excessively difficult to manage on the basis of their generic presentation. WordPress does a fairly decent job in providing a decent interface, but I do find it lacking at times (maybe I need to become more familiar with it).

Another idea would be some widget builder. Just stuff to fill your site. I’ve seen the web desktops but those felt more novel than useful. If anything, those seem more useful for corporate intranet sites as opposed to be something practical for consumers. Or perhaps this build might be more sophisticated to present different visual styles a non-designer can select through to create a generic stylesheet.

A real test could be figuring out how to build tools to create visual games. After playing with Raphael.js, I got a sense of the potential for how SVG could be used for the web. But the library by itself is inadequate outside of just providing wrappers to create the SVG inside a piece of HTML (for instance). But I can easily see how one could some day create something like a Photoshop or Gimp for the web with that tool without the need for the Flash plugin.

The good thing about my work is that I’ve been forced to move from a purely server side vantage point to a visual one. However, the lessons I’ve learned from the server side with regards to business still provide extremely valuable spots on the visual side, which might not yet be tapped into from a technological point on the web. Think in terms of how something like an ExtJS, Microsoft Foundation Classes or Java’s Swing libraries provided some basic tools. But take those ideas and present them on a far larger scale, again referring back to the Lego analogy with the specific pieces.