I’m starting to hit a progression wall both in terms of currency and maps with my current character. Generally, when I’m hitting a limit like that, I end up getting an itch to try something different. Or at least test a build that I have been reading about. Since I have a few starter pieces now, I’m thinking it might be time to start looking to my next few builds.
A few years ago, I felt very strongly towards the development and adoption of Twitch as the ultimate streaming platform. However, once Amazon bought them out, I always had a concern in the back of my mind on how that transition would look. Today, my fears are fully realized and I decided that it’s time to put an end to my viewing days with them.
In a nutshell: pretty bad. I find that the current league is very bug prone to the point of game breaking. Two weekends in and I feel that this league is pretty subpar in terms of the overall vision of how the game should be moving towards. The thing is that I’m not the only one currently frustrated.
Jessica Jones season 2 was released on March 8th. I caught just the first episode the night it premiered and finished last night. Many people gave praise to the first season, especially the villain Kilgrave. How did season 2 hold up?
It was announced that Netflix has suspended (fired) Kevin Spacey from House of Cards (whom I believe he may have produced to an extent) after the allegations of sexual abuse came to light. Part of the situation might have been further exacerbated with him “coming out of the closet” at the same time, which was not ironically rejected by the LBGT community in poor taste and timing. In view of these matters, I wanted to provide some personal thoughts on the situation.
Last night, my wireless card on my Alienware Aurora R4 seemed to have failed without warning. Not sure exactly what happened but my system could not detect it. It freaked me out because I had done nothing and could not use any of the Windows diagnostic tools to recover it. Looking at the Device Manager, I could not see it neither.
What I found out is that the Alienware Aurora R4 has a rather common issue where you need to disconnect both the wireless and Bluetooth cables inside then re-connect them. It was a bit of a pain to do this since the cables are quite small and require tiny hands to perform the operation. However, after reconnecting both cables and powering back my Alienware Aurora R4, my wireless network came back.
This is a very strange error. I cannot think of anything that would cause this issue. The only thing that may have occurred is the fan since it’s the closest moving component. But even then that makes little to no sense as it’s far enough where it should not affect the wiring.
Since I’ve been playing Diablo 3 far more than World of Warcraft lately, the breaking news of Diablo 3 caught my attention. I’ve read a few reactions online, but I want to take a moment to offer some suggestions based on my experience in Diablo 3.
The current progression in patches for Diablo 3 seem like the right move. Nerfing Inferno, introducing Paragon levels and monster power I think have made the game worth playing. Of course, PVP is still up in the air and many are anticipating that patch down the line.
That all said, I’m very curious about how Diablo 3’s first expansion will be treated. How will it integrate into the current game? What will happen to people who have worked long and hard, maximizing gear and hitting level 10 Paragon? What will happen to people who never made it beyond normal mode yet want to give the expansion a try?
My whole thought process is that Blizzard needs to immediately examine its past mistakes and realize that the first priority should always be not just making a fun game, but, more importantly, not pissing off its customer base. This is such a critical idea because of how World of Warcraft and Diablo 2 have devolved into these farming games and have ultimately turned a lot of players off. With that in mind, how can Blizzard avoid inevitably angering its player base?
I think that Blizzard needs to look at how Burning Crusade fucked over a lot of raiders when green gear far exceeded epics that took people months of earning. I have a sneaky feeling that Blizzard can be real assholes in this regard, essentially making the hard labor of people meaningless almost instantly. As a result, it’s important that they value the current progression of players in the game in taking into consideration how the expansion should work.
I feel that the expansion should add more levels. Of course, the question becomes how will that inter-operate with Paragon levels? Or how will it work with those who barely finished normal mode but stopped on nightmare?
I think what should happen is that there probably should be around 10-20 more levels introduced in the game as the cap before going back to Paragon leveling at Inferno. Perhaps for every 5 Paragon levels, someone will gain an additional level after 60 until a cap of say 80 is reached. But the expansion should start from level 30 on normal mode. After that, nightmare will begin around 60, hell at 70 and inferno at 80.
I would make sure that the expansion between 30-60 is tuned such that leveling can occur fast if there isn’t a great deal of content (I’m thinking of Diablo 2 where we only got to see just one last act). At the same time, a toon going through normal mode shouldn’t be overwhelmed while those who have been in nightmare and hell can blast through the early phase until they reach the expansion’s version of nightmare
Where would that leave people who made it to Inferno and even hit the upper part of Paragon? First, I don’t think they should be forced to start at normal despite not finishing the first difficulty. I think they should be given an option if they meet a level criteria to skip into the next content zone and start from that point. That way they aren’t simply bored rushing through 3 parts of the same content over and over.
Next comes gear. This is a pretty sensitive issue, perhaps even more sensitive than leveling since real money probably is involved. I think devaluing the power of gear the way that World of Warcraft has done is a horrible idea. Those who have spent countless hours either farming or buying gear should be continuously rewarded for their effort. In this manner, I would suggest that the gear should last people up until Inferno at the very least. If not at least be given some boost in power so it scales for a bit into Inferno.
Of course, many people would also like to find items that can replace high level gear. That’s fine but I really don’t want to see a blues that exceed high end legendaries and set pieces for a while. That would imply that the hit points and damage done by mobs would have to be lower so that people who are well geared in Inferno can still make use of their items. You definitely don’t want a repeat of the entry point of Diablo 3 where Inferno was impossible except for the most hardcore players and cause the rest of the population to drop off after a week or two of futility.
Something else we’ll see are probably more mechanics for elites and champion packs. I heard that some of the problems initially were vortex + fire chains which would annoy the hell out of players along with the impossibility of kiting elites and champions on melee classes (btw whoever made that initial decision hopefully lost their job).
Content-wise, I hope we do not see the same bosses from Diablo 2’s extension. That won’t be fun. I think it was nice to have an ultimate enemy outside of Diablo himself. But it would be good to have multiple bosses and acts. I felt that Diablo 3 was underplayed with the last act being far too short and underwhelming.
What about new classes? I suppose that partly will impinge upon how PVP comes along (if it ever does). We saw the assassin and druid make their way into the D2 expansion, but then we lost other classes like the necromancer and paladin. Also, what will this mean for talents? Certainly, in an expansion you want to provide more abilities as characters level up. If not that then some other mechanism that allows one to boost their character. Honestly, I haven’t given much thought at this point in adding features for high level characters outside of providing more talents (and more spaces on the hotbar).
Regardless, I don’t know what type of classes should be added. I do feel that everything is pretty much covered at this point. It feels as though Diablo 3 had taken the WoW classes and integrated them together a bit (e.g. hunters being rogues + hunters, witch doctors as shamans + warlocks, monks being druids + paladins) So what can be left?
It really depends on the game play and the visual effects that can add, imo, that will make adding more classes worth the effort. One thing they could do is put more emphasis on a healer type of role. Unfortunately, I would hate to see Diablo 3 turn into a World of Warcraft in that regard. I’ve always felt that dedicated healer classes were probably one of the worst decisions a game could implement. Yes, you need healing in general, but I dislike the idea of depending on a sole class/role. This is a major issue in WoW at the moment, especially with group oriented situations.
In WoW, I think the issue has been attitude firstly. Too many healers who have huge egos or some personality problem because they know the importance of their role with regards to the entire group. Next, I hate the idea of emphasizing a role where the entire time someone is just waiting to react to cast a spell. I did hear that they improved the model for healing in WoW, but I still think it’s far from perfect.
I’m more of a fan of the archmage role from Bard’s Tale or the Bishop in Wizardry 6-7. In those situations, you had a class that could do decent damage and heal. However, they were relegated to either role and knew how to react at the right moment for the party. I guess Barbarian and Monk have something like that but it just feels odd. Either way, it is a non-existent role at the moment.
Beyond that I can’t think of any really solid class that isn’t somewhat covered. You can’t add utility classes to a game like this because they would get slaughtered. Of course, you could try reviving classic classes such as paladins, necromancers, druids, assassins, etc. But I can’t really see them adding much to the game, except maybe the necromancer. But I see the necromancer as just a wizard and witch doctor type with their summoning capabilities.
At any rate, I’m looking forward to seeing what the expansion brings us. Hopefully, they’ve learned a lot from the early failure of the design and make it so that progress is fun rather than a pointless grind tied to their piss poor accounting practices.
Also, let’s all pray that the lawyers and accountants have ABSOLUTELY NOTHING TO DO WITH THE GAME THIS TIME.
World of Warcraft originally allowed for interesting specs to come about as a result of a flexible talent tree. When Cataclysm came out, it destroyed the flexible system by forcing players to choose a talent tree from the beginning. Supposedly, the idea was to help “new players” in creating a more focused talent tree and removed “some unnecessary talents.” With Mists of Panderia, this talent tree will pretty much be non-existent in favor of the one that has evolved in Diablo 3.
However, the real issue is that the class system is narrowly defined into three types: tanking, damage and healing with a PVP equivalent for each side. PVP has been a massive thorn in the class system from the beginning since most of the real crying over overpowered classes have been as a result from arenas in trying to balance every combination. So the class selection is pretty much dull and narrow and just small variations on each type (for instance a damage-over-time vs burst damage, etc.)
At the moment, this issue kicks in when people have to work in PVE teams like raids and dungeons. If a healer or tank goes down, pretty much the rest of the group is in trouble. Although there are certain classes like druids and death knights that can perform a battle resurrection, you’re pretty much at the mercy of a random party generator in getting enough of those classes. Things become worse as an imbalanced party (say all hunters or rogues) can make an instance a pure nightmare.
The problem is that some classes lack any useful utility at all. Or their utility is really situational. From that, everyone then becomes dependent upon a few select classes, which just makes the game horribly frustrating. This is why I propose re-doing the way classes work in the game.
First, I think that the notion of tanking, healing and damage as pure roles should be eliminated. I think each class should have some capability for each role. My ideal class is the enhancement shaman. I like the class because you have good burst DPS, some healing (both AoE and larger ones) and some tanking (rockbiter on a weapon along with their totem to hold aggro). What makes the enhancement shaman for me interesting is how they can be used as to help with healing using Maelstrom Weapon. For instance, let’s say you’re fighting Yor’sahj and the Mana Void appears. Your healers will pretty much be at the mercy of your DPS until it goes down. However, a smart enhancement shaman could help with healing since their mana pretty much never goes down.
That’s just one example of a larger potential picture. I know Rift did something like this where each class could perform multiple duties. An example someone mention was how a rogue could be a tank. Why not? What if a combat rogue utilized stealth to evade damage? What if they put Tricks of the Trade on themselves to increase aggro on themselves? Or what if Beast Master hunters could tank by using their pets? In Icecrown Citadel, one of the bosses required an additional tank-like toon. It wasn’t uncommon to see a hunter or a warlock use their pets to hold some aggro for that fight.
The thing is that the ideas for sub-roles have been around for a while, but the expansions have slowly been eliminating them in favor of some delusional balancing act. Worse yet I think removing the more flexible talent tree system hurt the game in forcing players into a very simplistic mind set of playing their toons. People know only how to kill things for the most part but don’t know how to fully utilize their characters’ abilities. Also, I think that the whole balancing act ended up creating more confusing specs as each tree would get its turn for the DPS of the month award.
From my point of view, I see most of the talent trees to be pretty much useless. For instance, you have a survival hunter and marksman hunter trees. Originally, I believe that survival was more of a PVP spec or perhaps even a melee spec. But now it seems to play more like a damage-over-time spec, whereas marksman seems to do just burst damage. Honestly though, I think both specs are redundant. To me both are just “ranged specs;” the only true difference is that one gets an interrupt and some healing while the other gets a secondary CC. Beast Master would almost be useful except that it really just is a leveling spec. However, I’ve seen people level as both survival and marksman, so what’s the point of having a leveling spec? BM as a leveling spec made far more sense in pre-Cataclysm since you needed your pet to hold aggro. But once you hit 85, BM pretty much dropped off. Maybe it has some PVP utility but the real power lies in the pet’s ability to tank.
That led me to realize that survival and marksman should be thrown away in favor of just a pure ranged spec. Since MoP will get rid of the secondary weapon slot for hunters (or ranged for melee), survival pretty much becomes a meaningless class, something far removed from the original intent (which, imo, was more or less a Legolas-type of ranger who could dual wield and fight in melee). That leaves an open idea for the hunter. I think that an interesting possibility would be to add a healing type of spec for them. They currently have spirit bond and marksman hunter’s chimera shot functions as a healing type of ability. So what if they provided a group type of healing ability? Maybe this spec could have a pet that could boost healing. Part of the spec might have the healing impinge upon doing damage similar to how Chimera Shot provides healing to the hunter. Perhaps, the pet could provide low group healing while alive while Chimera Shot does burst healing to the person near the target (or to the shooter).
The revamped hunter idea I proposed here is just one of how I see revamping the classes in order to make them more useful and more interesting. But let’s take my hunter example further. The main idea I see with revamping the classes is to provide degrees of healing, damage, etc. Let’s say in the case of the hunter healing is weak, but that they could put talent points into a certain type of healing or more points into aggro generation, damage reduction, etc. rather than just critical strikes.
Or let’s revamp the enhancement shaman so that they can tank. Maybe their earthen shield is their major damage reduction capability. Rather than just restoration shamans possessing it, any shaman can take talent points to use it along with rock biter weapon. Part of their rotation might be to use a greater healing wave on themselves whenever Maelstrom Weapon procs. And rather than just dual wielding weapons, they could use a shield.
What about priests? Although Shadow Priests are the favored class to solo/level, I see disc priest as being redundant. Some people say that discipline priests are more PVP healers, but it isn’t uncommon to see them being raid healers either. Their main ability is Power Word Shield, which, to me, is where tanking might be a possibility. The problem is that I think discipline priests were designed more for PVP in mind. So having two types of healing specs can make things a little confusing, imo. I like the idea of cross breeding the discipline priest and shadow priest for a tank-like spec. You get the damage dealing capabilities of the shadow priest with the protective abilities of the discipline side. Perhaps, part of the tree would be sacrificing some damage with damage mitigation.
Then you have mages and warlocks. I’ve heard arguments of how Warlocks became mages via the Destruction talent tree since Burning Crusade. The truth is that fire mages and Destruction warlocks look the same: DoT type of classes that burn things. The only difference is that Destruction warlocks get a pet imp. Demonology warlocks had some differentiation both from their pet and the ability to transform into a demon. Supposedly, their pet can tank to a degree, but the damage done by the warlock consistently hurts the aggro of the pet. But when you look at things in the overall scope, you start to realize that Demonology warlocks aren’t that much different from hunters (except that some hunter pets do a better job at holding aggro).
Either way, that makes me think that Demonology has to be revamped to make it even more distinct from hunters. Or rather the warlock class in general. I remember how back in the day warlocks were some of the most feared (literally and figuratively) classes in PVP. Just DoT some hapless victim up and fear them. I don’t really see that playing style used much in PVE though and it’s sad because it reduces one of their more useful functions (worse yet , shadow priest have nearly identical abilities except that their playing style seems far easier by comparison). The thing that made warlocks powerful back in the day was their crowd control. Although crowd control made a return in Cataclysm, it feels as though every class has some level of CC and that warlocks aren’t that special in this regard anymore.
So what to do about warlocks? Again, I think the three specs need to go away. I don’t want another burst mage. But having a tanking type does sound useful. Still, that idea is too similar to a beast master hunter by itself. You need to add more spice to make this class interesting. I’m not talking about just a rotation where you press buttons according to a priority list. I’m talking about defining situations to make what you do more interesting. Maybe make a warlock more like a necromancer, where they can use dead bodies to siphon part of their powers. For instance, group healing might occur by using dead bodies to channel some ritual. Or perhaps those dead bodies might enhance the warlock’s (or their demon’s) power. If Blizzard doesn’t intend to add a necromancer class, I don’t see a reason why the warlock could not perform similar duties.
Then there’s the death knight. Originally, when they came out there was tons of controversy over them. Either they were overpowered in battlegrounds after hitting level 58, or they were confusedly played as tanks in instances. But the idea of both a heroic class and being able to tank or DPS in any spec hit a nerve with me. That nerve was that both ideas were interesting. It was the execution that stunk all this time.
My first death knight was a blood death knight. This was during Wrath of the Lich King. They were interesting in that they had good self-heals and some threat generation. Later, when I switched servers, I started from scratch and tried an unholy death knight. I got annihilated and went straight to blood after the starting zone because I missed the blood spec. Of course, the damage wasn’t as great but they still were pretty powerful and fun to solo. However, when I started hitting instances, I went to frost and found a fun, bursty-type of DPS class. Several patches later, I found frost to be almost as boring as an arcane mage since you’re pretty much hitting 1-3 buttons at most.
So in seeing the different type of playing styles, I thought a bit about how this class could be made more interesting. In the past, I think with blood vs unholy vs frost, what you see mostly (or at least originally planned) was a class that could tank via self-heals vs tanking with a pet vs a class that could tank with AoE abilities. That makes for more interesting conceptual game play. I think the problem in WOTLK with death knights was just that they could get squished since they lacked a shield and that their damage reduction abilities were far too spread apart between trees. Right now, Blood DKs are supposedly really powerful since their Death Strike sustains them (if you do doubt Blood DKs, go check out various videos of some that solo the Lich King or Cataclysm instances).
The thing is that DKs actually have some hidden healing talents. Better DKs use their Raise Dead capability. However, they also can use their Death Coil for minor ally healing. I don’t think I’ve seen any Death Knights use that ability, but it’s there. If the ability could be expanded, the Death Knight class could be even more useful. The thing is that you have to look at the class in relation to everything else, especially the paladin, which, is traditionally what a Death Knight is the anti-thesis of. That idea is what really drives a class more than this stupid idea of game balance.
For instance, before death knights in Vanilla WoW, shamans and paladins were really their faction’s respective opposites. Shamans were pagans, having melee and some ranged capabilities while paladins derived their powers from the Gods, had good armor but lacked ranged abilities. With the introduction of death knights though, I feel that this class is the true anti-thesis of the paladin since their abilities are derived from an unholy nature. So motifs like corpses, dishonor, and ranged attacks fall more into what a death knight can do. Since Death Knights lack shields, they ought to do more damage as tanks while paladins might be able to reduce more damage by having a shield.
Again these are just some suggestions and ideas for improving the classes. But I’m noticing is that what you really want are categories of abilities that fall into degrees of powerfulness. The special effects that go along with these abilities and the situations are what will make each class distinct. The main thing is the degrees of powerfulness. That’s where talent points should be used again so that people can define their utility in each area to a certain degree.
Now, here’s where the tricky part comes into play: raiding and instances. What happens now in getting rid of core role types and splitting it into separate classes? What happens to things like 25, 40 or 10 man raids?
Personally, I hate the idea of raiding. I think raiding is just a big clusterfuck pure and simple. I hate having to wait for 25 people to show up and I hate it even more when people come and go, drop groups, pull unnecessarily, etc. The only thing about having 25 people is just a big, disorganized mess. Some people may argue about the whole “epicness” of having 25 people simultaneously together. But I see the situation as just having more random variables that are out of control on average. Also, I hate the idea of grinding for gear. It’s stupid and pointless, not to mention it puts the focus of the game on the wrong areas.
But how do you deal with the MM aspect of the MMORPGs? Well, given that LFR is still in its infancy, we have to give it the benefit of a doubt and see it as a system that will be in place for a while. The more critical question is taking my idea of eliminating the simplistic DPS/tank/healing classes into more broader ones per class and seeing how they fit into raids, LFR and dungeons. One possibility would be to do a computation on the server end for an LFR that would determine whether or not you have enough points in healing, DPS and tanking to survive. The problem is that really is just another form of gearscore or ilvl except that it’s placed on the talent tree.
In another model, you have pure versions of the three types of classes, except that each class can be of each type. In other words, a hunter can go tank or heals same with the rogue, mage, etc. That’s a good short term solution in that you eliminate redundant specs in favor of allowing any class to trade off. But for something like LFR, you’ll still encounter the problem where the vast majority of people only know one role. So even if a hunter could tank, they might not know how. As a result, you’re back to square one since people are just waiting for a certain type to enter the raid.
The last model is probably the most difficult to implement but potentially the most rewarding. The idea for this model is to eliminate pure roles from a raid (kinda like how PVE scenarios sound like they’re going). So instead of constantly waiting on healers to show up, anyone can heal. It then becomes the responsibility of the raid as a whole to ensure its survivability.
What happens if you get a situation where everyone just deals damage? Supposedly, in MoP they will be introducing a way to change specs on the spot for encounters. Depending on how that’s handled, it could be either really tedious or useful. I’m willing to bet on the later. Instead, I think what should occur is eliminating the idea of dual specs and making it so that you can purchase multiple specs instead. That might take care of some problems in providing more flexibility so that people aren’t forced to purchase a re-spec on the spot every time they hit an encounter.
Still that might not solve the issue of having enough damage, heals, etc. I think part of the problem in raiding is that it typically centers around fighting a single boss. Usually, the mechanics are pretty stupid. Two people trade off each other while healers keep them topped off while the DPS bring the boss down to health. Add a few more mechanics like adds spawning or the necessity to keep the raid up with raid-wide healing. Then you might have mechanics like moving out of fire or riding a drake. But for the most part the average raid encounter is stupid tank and spank.
The issue with this model is that you have a limited number of people absorbing damage while you have a limited number of people healing everyone up. I fail to see why the game has to be so limited in this manner. Why not have multiple tanks? Or what if spell caster likes a mage could provide some healing too? The problem with so many raid bosses is that they have wipe abilities where only tanks have enough life to withstand these capabilities and why you need certain classes to be able to top off these people.
These mechanics are too limiting. One this pretty much means that every encounter more or less is going to boil down to dealing with a single boss. And two, if it doesn’t deal with a single boss, then the encounter is about managing adds. But why can’t you have a big war where you have tons of adds, tons of melee just soaking up damage for the range to knock out? Can’t that be a raid encounter? And why just a single boss all the time? It feels like a stupid archaic arcade game where you fight all these smaller things leading up to the bigger thing.
The other thing is that some of these fights feel absolutely pointless. For instance, the dragon gauntlet before Ultraxion. All you’re doing is killing a bunch of adds for a few minutes and you can’t even loot them! Or the stupid slime encounter on Yor’sahj. What has colored boogers have any relevance in relation to Death Wing? But in each of these scenarios, you’re still dependent upon an egomanic tank or sleeping healers.
Now, I’m not sure how the PVE scenario thing might play out. What would be nice, if they took my suggestion for revamping classes, is that you pretty much “sign up” and the game does a check sum to ensure that certain minimum requirements are met. If not, then make encounters not boss centric but something more like a puzzle. You have to kill XXX in this section and that section. Or you need to solve a riddle by splitting up. Or maybe there’s a siege where your ranged are needed to take out people from a tower while melee hold their ground and absorb incoming damage from arrows.
At any rate, I think WoW has evolved to the point where it can be more than just hack-n-slash. Classes need to be richer. Raiding needs to be evolve too. Raiding at the moment is just for groups of people that have enough time to group up and coordinate against a boss. It can be more and linking that to how classes can and should do more will improve the game play overall.
I believe that religion and the concept of God are a disease of the mind. There’s very few other ways to describe how people, which presumably are intelligent, can be afflicted by something completely illogical. Or perhaps it is logical if you examine the notion through the microscope of Social Darwinism/survival.
I think the concept of God has evolved to explain to unexplainable and provide people with a false sense of hope to carry on in their darkest moments. While some situation provides no outcome except a dreary end, the presence of God exist to console people in those last moments.
By this lens, it would seem that God is actually a beneficial construct of the human mind rather than a disease, which by definition is contradictory. However, I am one that believes that people should strive for truth by which the notion of a God construct defies. God interferes in people obtaining truth by creating a crutch whenever a situation beyond their control presents itself. Similarly, when an event that has us evade some horrible fate occurs, people are quick to credit God or some celestial being as opposed to chance.
Personally, I think the concept of God is for all intents and purposes harmless by itself. In other words, people are entitled to give credence to things as they see fit. However, the real disease aspect comes from organized religion; in other words, where a select few share their value system of what God is with others in a massively distributed system. This part resembles a plague.
My belief is that those weak of mind typically are the most vulnerable. The idea of coalescing and unifying rather than fending off the tide of peer pressure is far more appealing when confronted with such choices. I mean, organized religion does have its role in society. From a spiritual sense, people need religion to engage in society when otherwise isolated. Even if the guy next to you has absolutely no relationship whether by interest or biology, sharing the same religion will provide a social bond.
The most obvious danger though is when we return to the idea of how people manipulate the concept of God for their own ends, but this time in mass. This is the point of contention that I think is the most pernicious in religion. To sway the weak willed to a few’s bidding to me stinks of politics as usual. However, the masses being unable to desire for truth any longer now assault those who want to obtain truth. But it’s not a point of negotiation in this; they will impinge on others to suck them in and here the analogy of the disease is complete.
Some people may argue, “Well, how do you know God exists?” Naturally, any atheist might reply, “Well, how do you know God does not exists?” Here, we have a Mexican stand off. But for myself, I believe that if a “true” God exists, he/she would not exists as this idealistic, omnipotent entity they many may see as perpetually benevolent. How many times has one asked for something, done everything he/she could do to be a good person but received nothing for something that was so important to them? Shouldn’t the world be better if a benevolent deity exists?
The usual responses would be things like, “God works in mysterious ways” or “God helps those who help themselves.” These are evasive pieces of rhetoric that prove nothing on either side. All it proves to me at least is that the God presented from organized religion’s view cannot exist as is.
That is not to say that a true God does not exist. God might have been one interpretation of what the Sun was, as described by some historians and ancient religions. God also could be a highly advanced species that occasionally visit the earth for one reason or another.
Sometimes, I muse over the idea that God (or the Gods) are just an alien race who either created or discovered the earth and it’s inhabitants and decided to fuck with people. I feel as though we are nothing more than some social science experiment. Or at least we’re under scrutiny. If anything and that these beings were an advance species who came to Earth as observers, the first thing that they must realize about us is that we’re fucking stupid. People never take the most logical path and rely far too much on emotions and some obscure/abstract way of thinking that defies sense.
If we were an experiment and one decided to come down and ask me, “So what do you think?” I would tell them, hey, we’re a huge failure. We’re more like a disease than a lofty species. We take things for granted, are willingly blind to truth, have no desire to care for one another nor the things around us, and just frankly don’t deserve to exist anymore.
Maybe these creatures don’t have the answer to resolving our problems either and are just trying to figure things out for themselves. But you cannot hope to hold humanity as the great savior of the universe the way things are. We need to have real change. But I think no one wants it for better or worse and that’s why we are doomed.