<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Keith's Web Blog RSS Feed</title>
<language>en-us</language>
<link>http://www.keithwatanabe.net/index.php</link>
<description>Keith Watanabe's Website</description>
<item>
<title>Mars Rovers</title>
<link>http://www.keithwatanabe.net/blogs/2004/2/12/e9cc5c3f46d3acb069562121659e3a62.html</link>
<description><![CDATA[Just want to say thanks to the guys at NASA and JPL for their work on the Mars Rovers.  Although there are still some bugs left in the system, the scientific output from these rovers has been nothing short of awe inspiring.  The great thing is that they've just begun!  I hope that NASA and JPL receive more funding for their programs as the technology will improve our lives.]]></description>
<pubDate>Thu, 12 Feb 2004 13:54:43 -0700</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.keithwatanabe.net/blogs/2004/2/12/e9cc5c3f46d3acb069562121659e3a62.html</guid>
</item>
<item>
<title>Human Cloning</title>
<link>http://www.keithwatanabe.net/blogs/2004/2/12/0f4164eb61f664bd7902d2e9635fdd8d.html</link>
<description><![CDATA[There's an interesting article on yahoo regarding another break through in human cloning.  The excerpt that I'm most interested in is where they talk about the Bush administration wanting a ban on all human cloning.  To Bush: you are not God.  For someone who easily was able to dictate the lives of Iraq and other countries as well as your own country, you easily boast standards from your own accord without the necessary balance of other people's opinions!  Countries are meant to be sovereign.  Although we live in an increasingly globalized and multicultural environment, we don't have the rights inherently to dictate everyone's lives.  Only God and the universe itself can do that.

Going back the human cloning, there's no good reason to ban it at least from an initial medical perspective.  We haven't, as a society and race, explored the possibilities of what human cloning can do for our lives.  Banning cloning is like banning free speech; we don't know the consequences because we are not prescient.  However, one thing for certain is that by banning such practices on faith alone, we prevent ourselves from seeing new possibilities.

But this will be akin to the acceptance of Darwinism.  Gradually, more societies will accept these practices as it becomes apparent that we need to discover more methodologies to increasing the sustainability of our species.  The ones who prevent such sustainability will slowly (and painfully through alienation) be snuffed out.

In general, I think as long as such methodologies are not abused and do not hinder our sustainability (such as creating a superior race that ends up wiping ourselves out), then we should continue pioneering these activities going forward.]]></description>
<pubDate>Thu, 12 Feb 2004 17:06:32 -0700</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.keithwatanabe.net/blogs/2004/2/12/0f4164eb61f664bd7902d2e9635fdd8d.html</guid>
</item>
<item>
<title>Mars Water?</title>
<link>http://www.keithwatanabe.net/blogs/2004/3/9/5fb782da4d7efb04352e6728b86b2ee3.html</link>
<description><![CDATA[Whelp, the announcement the other day by Nasa of Mars once holding water to me is typical Nasa flare for drama.  I find it a little hard to believe that their current findings after only a few months of work (and mishaps included!) provided enough evidence for making such conclusions.  Although I do believe they'll find more concrete evidence, what their rhetoric suggest is that they're attempting to stir public interest once again to obtain funds for future exploration.

Not that I disagree with their motives but when it comes to publicity I think Nasa is along the same lines as Bush at times.  To me it's a bit obvious that they're trying to push more funding to get their landers to Mars asap (which seem delayed because of recent budget cuts to the space program's funding).  I have no real problem with this goal, but I just wish they'd say it outright, considering that's what they really want.

I think the stink about this situation is that the scientists, despite having such "sophisticated tools," remain skeptical (as most scientists are) until some rocks are brought back.  Don't know which direction this will go but personally I hope they do get the funding...as long as they don't bring any strange mutations back with them :)]]></description>
<pubDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2004 00:37:48 -0700</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.keithwatanabe.net/blogs/2004/3/9/5fb782da4d7efb04352e6728b86b2ee3.html</guid>
</item>
<item>
<title>Cassini</title>
<link>http://www.keithwatanabe.net/blogs/2004/5/1/2b6977f4a5145dea35ebea24df53c8dc.html</link>
<description><![CDATA[This is going to be the next big project coming from JPL/Nasa and the European Space Agency.  In 40 days (from this point), Cassini will encounter a small satellite called "Phoebe."  Phoebe is on the outer reaches of the Saturn system and appears as a tiny, irregular dot that was photographed once during the Voyager 2 mission.  This time we'll get a full flyby as Cassini soars towards Saturn.  Roughly 20 days later, Cassini will lodge itself in the Saturn system and begin it's mission that I've been waiting for almost 10 years now.

The big thing to check out, obviously, will be the Huygens probe which will be deployed in January and descend into the  atmosphere of the satellite Titan.  Because we've only received scant images of this cloud obscured moon, I find the situation to be extremely exciting with the prospect of such a foreign world finally coming into view.  Ground images using radio techniques and other methods have brought some additional hints in these later years of what Titan might appear like on the surface.  Are there oceans of liquid methane?  We can't tell because of the thick atmosphere.  However, this time we will be able to.  The other thing to ask is if having the Cassini probe be more focused on the Saturn system this time around, will it be possible to obtain better resolution through it's own eyes whenever it passes by Titan?  Of all the moons in the solar system, I just find this one the most intriguing. ]]></description>
<pubDate>Sat, 01 May 2004 09:14:52 -0600</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.keithwatanabe.net/blogs/2004/5/1/2b6977f4a5145dea35ebea24df53c8dc.html</guid>
</item>
<item>
<title>Cassini Pictures</title>
<link>http://www.keithwatanabe.net/blogs/2004/5/27/0b683b4bd465959780212afa34328f4c.html</link>
<description><![CDATA[Nasa's Cassini website has been updated more frequently recently with Cassini taking a great deal of pictures.  You should take a look when you get a chance:

http://saturn.jpl.nasa.gov/index.cfm]]></description>
<pubDate>Thu, 27 May 2004 23:34:25 -0600</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.keithwatanabe.net/blogs/2004/5/27/0b683b4bd465959780212afa34328f4c.html</guid>
</item>
<item>
<title>Two more weeks</title>
<link>http://www.keithwatanabe.net/blogs/2004/5/30/3bd2a5cb5402d3bbfbf968034dd6c97e.html</link>
<description><![CDATA[Supposedly, the Saturn satellite Phoebe is coming into view finally.  We've got a countdown now of about 2 weeks (from 12-13 days).  Should be interesting as the technology has advanced compared to the Voyager and Pioneer missions as well as teh Gallileo mission.  What will we see?  I imagine something like the two Martian moons, except far colder.  Be great when that comes about.]]></description>
<pubDate>Sun, 30 May 2004 17:06:24 -0600</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.keithwatanabe.net/blogs/2004/5/30/3bd2a5cb5402d3bbfbf968034dd6c97e.html</guid>
</item>
<item>
<title>Venus in Transit</title>
<link>http://www.keithwatanabe.net/blogs/2004/6/9/bc9d93e8c809aa33ad2a276011b9338f.html</link>
<description><![CDATA[The past day showed Venus in transit as it passed in front of the Sun, a rare event that occurs only every 122 years.  Basically, it looks like a small dot on the Sun's surface.  As I was stuck in an office all day, I completely missed this event :(  Boo.  Hopefully, they invent anti-aging potions so I can see the next one in my penthouse.]]></description>
<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jun 2004 13:01:30 -0600</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.keithwatanabe.net/blogs/2004/6/9/bc9d93e8c809aa33ad2a276011b9338f.html</guid>
</item>
<item>
<title>First Phoebe Pictures Up</title>
<link>http://www.keithwatanabe.net/blogs/2004/6/10/dbbe17689e931a2725b699cfba722ccc.html</link>
<description><![CDATA[Go to the Cassini page to see the first of the Phoebe pictures, which are reportedly higher quality than the Voyager 2 visit.]]></description>
<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jun 2004 06:58:38 -0600</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.keithwatanabe.net/blogs/2004/6/10/dbbe17689e931a2725b699cfba722ccc.html</guid>
</item>
<item>
<title>Phoebe Come and Gone</title>
<link>http://www.keithwatanabe.net/blogs/2004/6/13/6a596ec3671c4353a6524a2f9d5f00a9.html</link>
<description><![CDATA["Like a candle in the wind..." is the best way to describe how the Phoebe encounter went with Cassini.  Although the best images have yet to hit the net, the views thus far have been quite stunning when you compare these photos against the Voyager blurs.  This time, we've received extremely clear cut images that reveal something that looks like an asteroid or perhaps the two satellites orbiting Mars.  Prior to Friday, our best images had been blobs with hints of craters and a roughly roundish shape.  But as those photos in the past were taken at a significant distance, we could only imagine the type of world that Phoebe presents.

What has been revealed is a heavily cratered world of at most 200 km in diameter and with some impact craters up to 50 km across.  Some areas show extreme brightness while others are hidden from view.  Honestly, it looks like a big, generic dirtball from the asteroid belt.  However, as Cassini had passed by at roughly 2000 km at the closest approach, we've yet to see the best.  Not to mention the other onboard instruments to reveal more about the planet's composition, etc.  Unfortunately, the delay from here and Saturn is quite a bit, so we can't exactly get the most up-to-date information.  However, so far, the experience has not been a disappointment.

From here, the next two big points will be this coming week on the 16th in a correction manuever, and following what will become a legendary move as the orbiter goes into an insertion mode into Saturn.  The move looks like something out of a science fiction movie and some mad scientist's mind.  Basically, the thing is going to shoot from below the gap in the rings and then rocket past Saturn, just hovering above the main rings before descending again through the gap and placing itself in orbit.  All this will occur within a 90 minute timespan.  Pretty daring?  My only concern is whether it gets pelted by debris and knocked into nothingness.  Hard to say, but I think this move is safer than landing on Mars at this point.  At least you can say those JPL guys like excitement when it comes to exploring with other people's money ;)]]></description>
<pubDate>Sun, 13 Jun 2004 19:44:59 -0600</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.keithwatanabe.net/blogs/2004/6/13/6a596ec3671c4353a6524a2f9d5f00a9.html</guid>
</item>
<item>
<title>Almost There....</title>
<link>http://www.keithwatanabe.net/blogs/2004/7/1/a9975db25c08897697fc564a5a39b3ed.html</link>
<description><![CDATA[When I'm at work later today, the Cassinni probe will finally enter orbit around Saturn.  This is an incredible moment (if you ignore the cowboy tactics) since they'll be flying THROUGH the rings and hovering over them.  It should be intense as a manuever and for the tension in the JPL rooms....of course, it could be like Red Leader in Star Wars:

"Arrgghhhhhh!!!!!"  *CRASH*

But I think the JPL team do not consist of a bunch of rebel hacks....just a bunch of geeky hacks ;)

Good team!  Looking forward to seeing everything work out and then from there, December with Titan!]]></description>
<pubDate>Thu, 01 Jul 2004 00:15:05 -0600</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.keithwatanabe.net/blogs/2004/7/1/a9975db25c08897697fc564a5a39b3ed.html</guid>
</item>
<item>
<title>Houston....We don't have a problem!</title>
<link>http://www.keithwatanabe.net/blogs/2004/7/2/445e087f02066dedf1bde9804ae7e42b.html</link>
<description><![CDATA[Actually, we should make that JPL (or Pasadena).  But the Cassinni has, indeed, made it and already photographed some magnificent pictures of the rings up close.  The perfection of these images demonstrates that the mission's beginnings have tons of features to look forward to.  This is one of the huge highlights....and if you think about it, we've only just begun!  There's four years of payload just waiting to analyzed.  So hold on as we get to see one of the most wonderful artifacts in our solar system!]]></description>
<pubDate>Fri, 02 Jul 2004 22:44:39 -0600</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.keithwatanabe.net/blogs/2004/7/2/445e087f02066dedf1bde9804ae7e42b.html</guid>
</item>
<item>
<title>Heading To Mercury</title>
<link>http://www.keithwatanabe.net/blogs/2004/7/31/55e5df0abfec90e35c3adc828bb6887a.html</link>
<description><![CDATA[Another big project for Nasa coming up is the launch of their Messenger satellite.  Despite the fact that Mercury is one of the closer planets, it'll be 7 years before Messenger enters Mercury's orbit in 2011.  The launch is scheduled in one day from now.  This time the challenge is one for handling the sweltering heat.  Being only 76 million miles or so from the Sun, this trip is worse than standing in Death Vallery on the hottest day of the year.  Probably more so as you'd probably turn to goo faster than Japanese women hitting a local sale.

I think the physics in this mission is far more interesting than the imagery.  Mercury isn't as glamorous as Titan or the Saturn system.  Nor is the place a viable source for living compared to Mars.  But just getting there and seeing our probe survive should be a feat in itself.]]></description>
<pubDate>Sat, 31 Jul 2004 21:57:40 -0600</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.keithwatanabe.net/blogs/2004/7/31/55e5df0abfec90e35c3adc828bb6887a.html</guid>
</item>
<item>
<title>Genesis or Extirpation?</title>
<link>http://www.keithwatanabe.net/blogs/2004/9/14/7a3b802a98809a229dd67be84e37df30.html</link>
<description><![CDATA[Saw how the Genesis project literally crashed and burned.  Sometimes I really wonder what NASA/JPL are thinking when they do these things.  Now, I like the idea of collecting solar particles to perform scientific study, but the recovery idea was something out of a caltech grad's idea for some film class.  Come on!  Hollywood stuntment to perform this feat?  It's shit like this that makes NASA/JPL have such a shitty reputation at times.

Seriously, guys when you're out there doing some multi-billion dollar program, don't fuck around!  Although I hate Jerry Brockheimer films, the one thing about Armageddon that I do like is how they classified those NASA/JPL guys as idealistic cowboys.  You really need people to be practical when you run these programs.  This isn't McGuyver where a piece of gum a paper clip, and a toothpick are going to produce the solution for world hunger.  I admire the fact that these guys can get a probe to Mars or travelling to Saturn, but some of the (literally!) stunts these guys pull sometimes is too frustrating.  No wonder why the US government is going after them.]]></description>
<pubDate>Tue, 14 Sep 2004 05:40:21 -0600</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.keithwatanabe.net/blogs/2004/9/14/7a3b802a98809a229dd67be84e37df30.html</guid>
</item>
<item>
<title>TB Mutations</title>
<link>http://www.keithwatanabe.net/blogs/2004/9/21/78bd135e97b99c86bffd79c50243b9de.html</link>
<description><![CDATA[One of my biggest fears has been TB.  My roommate in college at one point had been diagnosed with TB, although I believe he had an inactive version.  I made the mistake of not going to the doctor immediately (why wasn't the rest of the dormitory informed at the time?)  Later I took a test and found that I was okay.  Still, recently a friend of mine from Japan who obtained a green card was diagnosed with the disease.  When I asked him about the beginnings of the problem, he kinda accused me of when it happened.  I was shocked as I had been in good health at that point, even taking a physical a year before.  Still things could happen.

The latest news is how antibiotic resistant strains of TB may become a global epidemic.  Most of this occurs in poorer countries.  However, I've been suspicious of Japan especially Tokyo because of the subway system and the insane crowdedness.  Jokingly, I've called Tokyo's subway system the virus pellets because essentially it's easy to catch something while on those things.  And despite having one of the better healthcare systems in the world, I don't fully trust the Japanese government, hospitals and such when it comes to screening diseases.  

Those fears aside, the issue of TB on the rise is, indeed, a cause of worry.  Part of my reason for moving back to LA asap is to avoid being in a crowded city like Tokyo.  People say that LA is dangerous because of the guns, but as I've replied it depends on the areas you travel to.  Tokyo has its own dangers, one I believe is disease.  I've gotten sick more times in the last 2 1/2 years than I have in LA since college.  I'm of course hoping that most of my sickness is the common cold, but it always freaks me out since the language is different and getting good help can be frustrating.

Still though what made me write this blog up was my concern that we don't spend enough money into medical research.  I'm a huge fan of biological and genetic research.  Ever since having a hardcore biology research roommate in college, I've been fascinated with the genome project.  Of great achievement was the completion of the human genome mapping in 2003.  Still I feel we're still a long ways off from utilizing this progress.

I've tended to think that much of our progress has been hindered by politics and ethics (a kind of subpolitic).  Obviously, people can abuse such knowledge but if the intent is to resolve world epidemics like AIDS and TB, why prohibit it?  I'd hate to think some politician or some guy on a farm in Nebraska has more say on the world's future than a trained researcher.  Within the next 10 years we should have progressed enough in medical sciences to squelsh these epidemics along with cancer since they've long been our foes.  But why don't we hear more of promising progress rather than politics on these subjects?  That to me is utterly frustrating especially when your life is at stake.

What's more disturbing is how the government (especially the US) is willing to spend more money on defense than on medical research and technologies that aim to help the human race rather than destroy it.  Think of all the jobs that can be created through all the defense funds if we placed them into medical research and technology.  Plus we could contribute to poor nations by providing them the technology and science to help create awareness and lower the rate in which these things are spread.  Are people just avoiding this because of fear of overpopulation growth?  If that's the case, then we shouldn't even debate about our future.  I mean, if overpopulation growth is a real fear, why not put more money into space exploration and human habitat on other worlds?

I think there needs to be an increasing amount of privatization for this stuff as well.  Competition and business seem to be the only driving forces outside of money.  Also, they need to curb patent infringement for the private sector when it comes to medical applications since they (hopefully) are there to benefit mankind.  There really shouldn't be much of a debate when it comes to one's health.  Healthcare should be a right not an option some CEO corp turk can take advantage of on the populace.]]></description>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 Sep 2004 04:52:10 -0600</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.keithwatanabe.net/blogs/2004/9/21/78bd135e97b99c86bffd79c50243b9de.html</guid>
</item>
<item>
<title>Titan</title>
<link>http://www.keithwatanabe.net/blogs/2005/1/23/0006ceda0b1efe485c91adc0313f4487.html</link>
<description><![CDATA[Well one of my life dreams was met this past few weeks in the Hyugens project landing on Titan and broadcasting pictures from the site.  Really amazing as the world is probably more mysterious than ever despite the fact that we now have hard evidence of what it's like on the surface.  The interesting parts are the idea that it's a "flammable world" with these springs and river beds all around.  Now, there's still no clear evidence if indeed those streaks in the pictures are rivers.  However, it has been stated that in all likelihood the planet rains and the soil is soft, like clay, helping to point to the chemistry and composition of the satellite.

I'm interested in seeing what future missions we'll see.  Because this has been a success, I think this will help improve chances to receive funding for future missions.  The real issue to me though is finding the next form of propellent.  I've read about several existing methods, but none plausibly allows us to move to the outer planets quickly and efficiently at the moment.  Hopefully, these problems will be solved in the near future, but that's really a condition of the government.]]></description>
<pubDate>Sun, 23 Jan 2005 19:55:02 -0700</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.keithwatanabe.net/blogs/2005/1/23/0006ceda0b1efe485c91adc0313f4487.html</guid>
</item>
<item>
<title>Simplification of Science</title>
<link>http://www.keithwatanabe.net/blogs/2005/2/7/0140e9d45d89ffd2b0b956d556a6fa8b.html</link>
<description><![CDATA[I started thinking about what I stated about computing (and Sun) regarding the simplification and rise in popularity of scripting languages.  What I find funny (at least from my perspective) is that outside of computing, I haven't found too much of the same thing with other fields like math.  Okay, maybe doing a derivative is still faster than doing the limit thing to find the rate of change in an equation.  But something bothers me that we're teaching kids the *HARD* and tedious ways of approaching things like math.

It's good to know how to perform math equations and such by hand.  However, as technology advances, should we also advance the techniques so we can bypass all the crap to allow new breeds of engineers to produce at greater rates?  If you look at the scientific community, you'll notice that nothing ever grows simpler; the world actually grows more complex with the proverb being "asking more questions from the answers we derive."  What good is that?  Shouldn't we find manners of simplifying that, creating short cuts and cheats that help in the accuracy of our research?

Sometimes I feel like what school is doing is simply throwing more monkeys to solve an easy equation.  We're not asking the appropriate questions nor approaching the problems correctly.  It's like we do the hard stuff to torture ourselves.  Makes no sense.  

A friend of mine once mentioned intelligence augmentation from devices like PDAs.  It was an interesting observation because those devices save us from headaches when we need to remember something critical.  Something just is massively wrong about the way we're doing things.]]></description>
<pubDate>Mon, 07 Feb 2005 00:05:48 -0700</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.keithwatanabe.net/blogs/2005/2/7/0140e9d45d89ffd2b0b956d556a6fa8b.html</guid>
</item>
<item>
<title>Looking at Enceladus</title>
<link>http://www.keithwatanabe.net/blogs/2005/2/18/2faf734dfe9bb13f5d71e021e8a25b02.html</link>
<description><![CDATA[Just passing by Titan, Cassini also made a quick stop by Enceladus which is one of the most reflective surfaces in the solar system.  It's hypohesized that the surface is composed possibly of something similar to freshly fallen snow.  This also marks Cassini's third flyby of a major satellite in the Saturn system.  Although the big gem was Titan, the other members of the Saturn system have a wealth of knowledge yet to be unlocked.  And we still have a number of healthy years to look forward to in this excursion!]]></description>
<pubDate>Fri, 18 Feb 2005 00:03:47 -0700</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.keithwatanabe.net/blogs/2005/2/18/2faf734dfe9bb13f5d71e021e8a25b02.html</guid>
</item>
<item>
<title>Mad Cow Detection</title>
<link>http://www.keithwatanabe.net/blogs/2005/3/5/f59ab5210a0c4fe87645305a7156a52e.html</link>
<description><![CDATA[Interesting article about how the Japanese are researching a device to detect for mad cow disease.  Pretty cool if they can make a breakthrough with this technology.  Not that it would prevent mad cow disease but at least beef might be safer since there would be a more accurate measure for testing.]]></description>
<pubDate>Sat, 05 Mar 2005 12:02:33 -0700</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.keithwatanabe.net/blogs/2005/3/5/f59ab5210a0c4fe87645305a7156a52e.html</guid>
</item>
<item>
<title>Titan Having Volcanoes?</title>
<link>http://www.keithwatanabe.net/blogs/2005/6/14/5a53751681e5875b81d626d672173c48.html</link>
<description><![CDATA[New theories with recent infrared photographs from Cassini have surfaced regarding a particular, circular spot on Titan, being a possible volcano.  Although there's no positive way to confirm this at the moment with Titan's thick haze completely blocking out regular visual speculation, scientists still regard this as a new possibility to explain how methane to driven into the air.  The Hyugens probe didn't spot any hard evidence visually of rivers (although canal-like structures seemed apparent) so this might be a new avenue to examine in the notion of Titan's atmosphere.]]></description>
<pubDate>Tue, 14 Jun 2005 00:30:31 -0600</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.keithwatanabe.net/blogs/2005/6/14/5a53751681e5875b81d626d672173c48.html</guid>
</item>
<item>
<title>In a bit of positive news....</title>
<link>http://www.keithwatanabe.net/blogs/2005/8/9/59926552f337499d4eab0dc5465e394d.html</link>
<description><![CDATA[The shuttle has landed safely today in California at 5 am PST.  of course, the shuttle is going to be grounded indefinitely until the issue of the foam tear is resolved.  hopefully, they can get it up and running in the near future as things like the space station is in a perpetual halt because of this.]]></description>
<pubDate>Tue, 09 Aug 2005 13:57:28 -0600</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.keithwatanabe.net/blogs/2005/8/9/59926552f337499d4eab0dc5465e394d.html</guid>
</item>
<item>
<title>Pluto Explorer Blasts Off!</title>
<link>http://www.keithwatanabe.net/blogs/2006/1/21/8abd2bcc86cbcd7f8b2c7c331537d87a.html</link>
<description><![CDATA[Another victory for the space program, the Pluto Explorer, aka New Horizons, has launched successfully and is scheduled to encounter Pluto in no less than 2015.  Yes, roughly 10 years from now.  But hey, I'll be able to see Pluto in my lifetime as well as possibly seeing Kuiper Belt objects.  So I guess, I'll report again in 2015 for this :)  Good luck all!  Hopefully by then we'll discover some technology that'll speed up the entire process (namely get Bush out of office so we get more funding for technology and science!!!!!!)]]></description>
<pubDate>Sat, 21 Jan 2006 23:49:02 -0700</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.keithwatanabe.net/blogs/2006/1/21/8abd2bcc86cbcd7f8b2c7c331537d87a.html</guid>
</item>
<item>
<title>Stardust returns....stardust!</title>
<link>http://www.keithwatanabe.net/blogs/2006/1/21/0b0272d13739d9b9b715f02996e55eee.html</link>
<description><![CDATA[Actually from a comet.  But the fact remains that the Stardust project had been a success with the capture of comet dust using aerogel.  Of course, the details of the findings from comet matter will be issued as time will tell, but for now this part of the mission has been a wild success.  Hopefully, we'll see more interesting projects like this in the near future.]]></description>
<pubDate>Sat, 21 Jan 2006 23:51:11 -0700</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.keithwatanabe.net/blogs/2006/1/21/0b0272d13739d9b9b715f02996e55eee.html</guid>
</item>
<item>
<title>Virgin Galactic Signs with New Mexico</title>
<link>http://www.keithwatanabe.net/blogs/2006/1/22/1ec4a0da5bbbc7f46d514a8ad089dba9.html</link>
<description><![CDATA[This is the first time I heard of something like this but I believe this may be one of the first public "spaceports."  meaning that the intent eventually will be used to fly civilians in space.  the cost will be limited to CEOs, famous stars, politicians, mega stock traders, and their ilk.  but at least something like this is being made since there hasn't been much advancement in space travel for the longest time at least for us groundlings.  $200 million dollars in the southern part.  makes sense.  if there's a crash, not too many people will be destroyed ;)]]></description>
<pubDate>Sun, 22 Jan 2006 00:12:51 -0700</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.keithwatanabe.net/blogs/2006/1/22/1ec4a0da5bbbc7f46d514a8ad089dba9.html</guid>
</item>
<item>
<title>congrats to JPL!</title>
<link>http://www.keithwatanabe.net/blogs/2006/3/11/19532dabfffe81ea2ecd18b35e532cdd.html</link>
<description><![CDATA[the Mars Reconnaissance Orbiter has successfully entered into an insertion orbit around Mars.  considering the difficulties of getting to Mars and the history of failures there, this has to be another great achievement for JPL.  the more of these missions that succeed for JPL, the more funding they should receive for doing future projects.  unfortunately, there's only two more projects in the works for Mars and those won't occur until 2007 and 2009 respectively.]]></description>
<pubDate>Sat, 11 Mar 2006 21:34:40 -0700</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.keithwatanabe.net/blogs/2006/3/11/19532dabfffe81ea2ecd18b35e532cdd.html</guid>
</item>
<item>
<title>Virgin Atlantic and $200k/person flight</title>
<link>http://www.keithwatanabe.net/blogs/2006/3/12/65ee6ac9009e8c6d5cf51bd607652dd3.html</link>
<description><![CDATA[they already managed to sign up 100 people who had $200k worth of disposable income.  that's almost enough to clear my father's medical bills!  this is like that cheesy $25 10 second thrill ride on the Stratosphere in Vegas.  i like what Virgin Atlantic is doing, but there would be a wonderful sense of justice if that first one had some mishap with those 100 people riding it ;)]]></description>
<pubDate>Sun, 12 Mar 2006 00:19:00 -0700</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.keithwatanabe.net/blogs/2006/3/12/65ee6ac9009e8c6d5cf51bd607652dd3.html</guid>
</item>
<item>
<title>theories on Titan</title>
<link>http://www.keithwatanabe.net/blogs/2006/7/20/ecca0d763c2953161f821d4999f3d21f.html</link>
<description><![CDATA[i was reading about how Cassini has revealed more of the Xanadu region being earth-like.  along those lines they discussed in another article how Cassini has been able to discover more river canals.  however, when the Hyugens probe landed, there was no evidence of rivers, although the surface texture was described as being like "creme brule."  that led me to speculate that perhaps Titan has no real rivers, methane river canals nor rain in an earth-like sense.  instead, i believe that because of the freezing temperatures, most of the liquids in the atmosphere freeze up and become more like a slushy that you get at 7-11.  so rather than finding expected rivers or lakes of liquid, the expected lakes are really nothing more than sludge.  of course, to truly verify such a theory, they'd have to throw another lander onto the satellite, but it is one possible explanation.]]></description>
<pubDate>Thu, 20 Jul 2006 05:50:38 -0600</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.keithwatanabe.net/blogs/2006/7/20/ecca0d763c2953161f821d4999f3d21f.html</guid>
</item>
<item>
<title>pathetic scientists</title>
<link>http://www.keithwatanabe.net/blogs/2006/8/26/495140cf9115a96c007994980cc6dca9.html</link>
<description><![CDATA[sometimes i think scientists are some of the most pathetic people in the world.  recently, it was announced that Pluto no longer is a planet after "much debate."  i find arguments like this incredibly silly and wonder how people can get paid so much money for sitting around trying to re-write history.

the thing that bugs me the most is that these people are supposedly some of the most intelligent people in the world. yet for all their intelligence, they waste time debating on a historical definition rather than figuring out how to make space travel more efficient so we can get to Pluto faster.  the irony in this is outstanding.

naturally, some argumentative fucker is going to make a call on me and say, "Hey you're writing a blog!  You're equally useless!"  my response is simple: the subject is not about me here.  it's about scientists who ought to be hella smarter than my dumb ass and be working on solutions to improve mankind, not the satisfaction of academic discourse.]]></description>
<pubDate>Sat, 26 Aug 2006 15:27:06 -0600</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.keithwatanabe.net/blogs/2006/8/26/495140cf9115a96c007994980cc6dca9.html</guid>
</item>
<item>
<title>Mars Reconnaissance Orbiter Completes Aerobreaking!</title>
<link>http://www.keithwatanabe.net/blogs/2006/9/2/b8557b39eee44937917c492a4fe27fa8.html</link>
<description><![CDATA[All the looping and dipping around Mars will pay off very soon (or rather it has) as the MRO finished the aerobreaking exercises on 8/30/2006.  it'll be interesting to see what science the MRO will be producing in the upcoming months.  One element it will have is providing a communications channel for future Mars missions.  It's being called an interstellar (?) internet relay of sorts.

Right now though, the primary mission won't begin until this November due to the positioning of the Earth and the Sun.  So got a little more to wait before some science rolls in.

Good job guys! ]]></description>
<pubDate>Sat, 02 Sep 2006 12:25:20 -0600</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.keithwatanabe.net/blogs/2006/9/2/b8557b39eee44937917c492a4fe27fa8.html</guid>
</item>
<item>
<title>Orion: the next advance in space exploration</title>
<link>http://www.keithwatanabe.net/blogs/2006/9/2/afef0d7187730446ad7cedce796c67ce.html</link>
<description><![CDATA[for the US at least.  NASA named a winner in their search for the next shuttle builder in Lockheed Martin.  

http://www.nasa.gov/mission_pages/constellation/orion/index.html

The new vehicle is an enhanced, larger version of the old Apollo craft.  I guess the space shuttle models were too large and harzardous to be deemed practical at this point in time.  Nonetheless, they're going to be return fairly soon so getting the next generation of ships is imperative.

However, in seeing this new vehicle, I personally am disappointed.  Maybe it's the small size giving me a feeling of being underwhelmed or that people might be taking a step back.  I actually see things in reverse of what NASA and the airline industry should be doing in building smaller vs larger respectively.

Despite this, because of politics and lack of funding, I sense that it'll be private businesses truly driving the next generation of space exploration, rather than the government.  The few billionaires in the world with outbound dreams are the ones who'll push innovation.  Again to me it's not a matter of science, but more of marketing, money, and politics.

Naturally, if our chief competitors in the world like India and China overshot us in this department (which is quite possible), the space race might have more support from the US government.  I'm going to keep my eye out on that spaceport in New Mexico, even though they're taking forever to accomplish something that ought to take a year.]]></description>
<pubDate>Sat, 02 Sep 2006 12:41:18 -0600</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.keithwatanabe.net/blogs/2006/9/2/afef0d7187730446ad7cedce796c67ce.html</guid>
</item>
<item>
<title>congrats Nasa</title>
<link>http://www.keithwatanabe.net/blogs/2006/9/21/acc0f7b3613bbed5a1395c1d3b32eef3.html</link>
<description><![CDATA[The shuttle landed safely tonight (well for us in the East).  equally important, the mission to install the solar arrays on the international space station went successful.  this part implies that the space station will have additional power for future missions.  of course, this part is not done as there is another array to be delivered.  but that is expected to come about in the next few months (hopefully).  i'd like to see the space program for the space station to become aggressive once again and continue assembling it as it's a positive step towards Man in space.]]></description>
<pubDate>Thu, 21 Sep 2006 08:08:22 -0600</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.keithwatanabe.net/blogs/2006/9/21/acc0f7b3613bbed5a1395c1d3b32eef3.html</guid>
</item>
<item>
<title>Spaceport America</title>
<link>http://www.keithwatanabe.net/blogs/2006/9/24/d3c8e99c145667b0449dcda2511555e3.html</link>
<description><![CDATA[It's official:

http://www.spaceportamerica.com

The new name for the spaceport in New Mexico has been declared with the homepage.  One contractor has already been declared to design this, with an estimated 3500 jobs by the year 2020.  Those are probably just the maintenance crews, flight operators, attendants, engineers, etc. to get this thing started.  At the moment, the only company (that i know of at least) that will immediately appear is Virgin Galactic.  2010 is the key date.  unfortunately, the dollar price for a ticket is $200k with only 5 minutes of weightlessness.  so this is definitely a novelty for the social elite.

my concern is that despite these numbers, there are two issues remaining: the practical value involved and the high cost for ordinary citizens.  in terms of practical value, there really isn't any.  practical value would dictate that we could use space flight to arrive at another destination on earth far faster than current means with our 747s, etc. or that we would have trips to the moon, Mars and the space station.  these trips do not serve any of these purposes except as a cheap high for people like Paris Hilton (assuming that Paris has any desire to fly).

Then the issue of the average person comes into play.  Mostly, it's cost but it would be the middle class that would drive the demand and economics up for such a thing and move the pricing downwards.  Here, you would need at least two other competitors to make this situation feasible.  Still it really isn't useful at this point to the normal person.

Personally, i feel that corporations ought to be setting up long term plans of reaching areas like the moon or colonies in space (not on Mars yet).  Plans like early phasing of lunar colonization by sending materials and supplies to the moon to begin creating the foundations of infrastructure there.  Mining tools and factories for utilizing the raw materials on the moon would need to be flown in parallel as people were slowly prepared to move in that direction.  Elements like oxygen and sustenance to me seem to be something that should be brought with the people to avoid spoiling.  i'd imagine that some kind of railroad between the Earth and the Moon would be required to usher in new supplies and people until the colonies become self-sustaining.  i imagine that a population of at least 1000 would be the bare minimum to get that type of efficiency going.  that's the point when the spaceport and commercial space flights would become useful to the average person as now there's a clear destination and purpose defined.  until then the demand would probably be low since most people would have no use.]]></description>
<pubDate>Sun, 24 Sep 2006 08:30:41 -0600</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.keithwatanabe.net/blogs/2006/9/24/d3c8e99c145667b0449dcda2511555e3.html</guid>
</item>
<item>
<title>Cassini spots lakes</title>
<link>http://www.keithwatanabe.net/blogs/2006/9/28/71814b7437a99bd2005952ddff61b261.html</link>
<description><![CDATA[some interesting photographs of "lakes" from the Cassini spacecraft can now be seen on the website.  these are radio shots so naturally some verification would be needed.  still i'm certain that those shots would be enough evidence for scientists to thrum up more support for future missions towards the satellite.

right now, it's been written that these lakes are methane and ethane.  one of my theories is that the appearance might be like some tar pit.  but i hope that within my lifetime they are able to send another dedicated probe/lander to check one of these spots out.]]></description>
<pubDate>Thu, 28 Sep 2006 17:53:36 -0600</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.keithwatanabe.net/blogs/2006/9/28/71814b7437a99bd2005952ddff61b261.html</guid>
</item>
<item>
<title>Mars Reconnaissance Orbiter Spots One of the Rovers!</title>
<link>http://www.keithwatanabe.net/blogs/2006/10/7/fe47528d4297cb783ac234c8110f5392.html</link>
<description><![CDATA[here's an example of progress.  in an amazing photo shot, the newest Martian visitor has captured one of the Mars Rovers in a snapshot.  it's brilliant how scientists were able to clearly define and decide that the image taken was of one of the rovers.  considering the size of one of these rovers, the fact that the orbiter was able to see even the shadow of the camera is unbelievable.  i can hardly imagine the other science that this probe will provide.

after this one, in less than a year, the next lander will join this group in the form of the Phoenix project.  too bad at the moment we're only sending a probe about once every 1 1/2 years.  it seems that we should push the boundaries on this and see how far and fast we can take it.]]></description>
<pubDate>Sat, 07 Oct 2006 10:34:21 -0600</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.keithwatanabe.net/blogs/2006/10/7/fe47528d4297cb783ac234c8110f5392.html</guid>
</item>
<item>
<title>Intel's Former CEO and I agree</title>
<link>http://www.keithwatanabe.net/blogs/2007/11/5/f9b545291f60b43b35f73ac1f463494e.html</link>
<description><![CDATA[I applaud the general feeling that Intel's former CEO has made as referenced by the article below is similar to a rant I wrote a while back on my own frustrations of the medical industry and how I praised the technology/computer industry for true innovation and making a huge difference in the quality of lives of people.  The thing the former CEO and I hold in complete agreement is that the medical/pharmaceutical industry moves at a snails' pace.  Probably the only thing slower is the world of astronomy, but then again they worry about the true macro problems of the world.  <br />
<br />
All things considered, the fact that the computer industry has little history compared with the medical one says a lot.  It's disgusting watching companies put out products that have little visible benefits whereas an iPod can give one instant gratification.  I mean, I was using this drug to help my leg which has some sort of excema.  I spent over a thousand dollars for that along with this other drug to help my keloid problem on my chest.  Did any of these conditions improve?  No!  <br />
<br />
Compare that to a system I helped build for trading tickets online at Ticketmaster.  Various artists can benefit from that as can online resellers.  It took me less than a year to build my piece of the system.  <br />
<br />
One key thing that Grove pointed out was that the tech industry delivers and has schedules.  To put it bluntly, we work hard and have real milestones.  Researchers in labs just perform random experiments for their own intellectual fulfillment without caring that billions of people are suffering and dying depending upon their coffee breaks!<br />
<br />
One piece of insight that I didn't know about but I conjectured that Grove mentioned was that the medical industry faces these patent issues and a huge force to get grants.  There is a community that prevents people from getting through, which means that progress is slowed.  I didn't realize something like this existed, but it makes sense.  To me it seems that this organization is a perverse institution that has more interest in self-preservation than in producing medicine that people truly need.<br />
<br />
I hope this serves as a wake up call to the world of medicine.  But I think that the barriers of entry must be thrown down just as how development in the online world had been thrown down by the advent of the web. ]]></description>
<pubDate>Mon, 05 Nov 2007 18:33:20 -0700</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.keithwatanabe.net/blogs/2007/11/5/f9b545291f60b43b35f73ac1f463494e.html</guid>
</item>
<item>
<title>One Way Trip To Mars?  I Think So....Initially</title>
<link>http://www.keithwatanabe.net/blogs/2008/3/7/54aed305d862110d186a85464a106f0b.html</link>
<description><![CDATA[There was a link from Slashdot two days ago to an article about a former NASA engineer's thoughts on a manned trip to Mars.  The critical point was considering a way one trip to Mars.  Some of the subpoints in such a mission would be that only one person could do it.  The logistics of going to Mars is pretty nasty.  You have to worry about fuel, the energy necessary to lift off from the planet once it arrives, oxygen, supplies, etc.  It's not even a case of Robinson Crusoe; you have virtually nothing and even worse: a nearly non-existent budget from the government.   You're not even Christopher Columbus.<br />
<br />
I found some of the points to be interesting.  It seems that NASA is attempting to examine all combination of ways to get to Mars within their constraints.  The way I look the mission is that it'd certainly be a one way mission.  But I think that sending a single person would be folly.  My reasoning is that you have the worst single point of failure and no matter what, it'd be suicide.<br />
<br />
Sending multiple people to Mars is still suicidal and extremely high risk, but there's a balancing factor in the fact that multiple people can be more productive than a single person.  I mean, what is the point of sending a single person to Mars in the first place?  Is it just for novelty?  Is it to say that NASA was capable of doing so and could learn from the experience?<br />
<br />
I'd consider sending a single person a complete waste of potential.  If the mission failed in any manner (e.g. the astronaut going awol or dying by some freak accident), then all the planning would go down the drain.  Then the world would cry out about the impossibilities of going to space and the program would be set back another 10 years before people forget and realize that there was a reason for sending some suicidal scientists out there.<br />
<br />
Having multiple people would reduce part of that risk.  Certainly, the death rate is higher, but if you send a combination of men and women, there's always a chance for setting up a new colony and establishing some foundation while the next trips are being planned.<br />
<br />
It's interesting to note that the NASA engineer mentioned about the risk involved and how it's actually irrelevant in the whole matter.  And it's true because people are naturally daredevils.  Usually, it's the media or some stupid religious groups that conflate the issue and create public outcries against such programs without realizing that there's a clear purpose and that the people who took the risk more than likely understood the consequences.<br />
<br />
That all said, I still have to agree with the initial premise that the first trip to Mars is one way.  That's my gut feeling.  Mostly, my belief for this goes from the premise that the biggest factor in getting to Mars is the fuel.  Next the supplies.  I'd make sure to start planning how to create some sort of return vehicle, but I'd imagine that the return vehicle would require about 3-5 years of planning before it manifests.  <br />
<br />
I think one (sci-fi) type of plan might be to send a crew of say 10 people, split by men and women for a guaranteed period of 3-5 years.  The crew's purpose would be to start laying the foundation for future colonies.  So you'd naturally need to establish more than just science labs, which probably is all that NASA thinks about in these things.  <br />
<br />
As they say in survival class, you need to establish basic necessities immediately.  O2, food, water, and shelter.  The first three are the hardest since there are none at Mars.  I'd imagine you'd have to send regular cycles of supplies to the colony.  Say every 3-6 months.  Those supply trains would come from unmanned landers, maybe even parachutes.  Fortunately, those three elements can be easily packaged and more than likely would not have delicate instruments.  So the packaging would not have to be sophisticated compared to, say, a rover.<br />
<br />
While the process for creating a supply train is being optimized, you'd need to establish how to recreate those necessities.  Since it's established that Mars has polar caps, one would think naturally that you'd want to utilize those resources and convert them into some form of O2 and distilled water.  However, I'm pretty certain that establishing a colony near those locations would be close to impossible initially due to the extreme cold.  So I'd mark that as a project for the distant future when the colony would have enough supplies to create factories and processes for the conversion and to be able to import those elements back to the main colony.<br />
<br />
Because of the difficulty in such a process (despite the necessity), I would focus on other necessities that are easier to handle (well relatively speaking).  Namely energy for the base.  Energy is critical for internal heating, communications back to Earth, etc.  So that might be easier to establish quickly for the colony's future growth.  You can't depend on nearly all of Earth's traditional energy creation methods like wind, oil, coal, nuclear or hydropower.  So the only known resource for power would be solar.  And you'd need a lot of panels.  I foresee something like an energy farm of solar panels for something like this.<br />
<br />
From there I think it'd be very critical to explore the place and look for potential sources of energy (outside of solar) and O2/H20.  More than likely though, it'd be very hard to find O2/H20 without hitting the poles.  And who knows how long that could take to get there from the landing zone.  However, finding something like nuclear energy would be a major step in engendering a means of getting back to Earth.<br />
<br />
Of course, I'd have a natural tendency to figure out how to create other manufacturing plants, in taking Mars' resources and converting them into something useful like building parts, etc.  But that would have a lesser priority until the basic foundation of the colony would be stabilized.<br />
<br />
So that still leaves us with the whole problem about food.  I know the ISS is conducting an experiment in the new <strong>Columbus lab</strong> in growing plants in outer space (really cool!).  Obviously if that experiment succeeds and is able to produce healthy plants that can sustain humans, it'd be a natural step in allowing people to have agriculture outside of Earth.  More than likely, such an idea ought to succeed.  From there, the question becomes &quot;What type of vegetables should be grown?&quot;  I think initially you could start off with four types: 1) Soy beans; 2) Rice; 3) Spinach; 4) Wheat.  Maybe even add carrots and tomatoes for coloring.  But soy would be my first pick as it's a naturally healthy and versatile product (soy milk, tofu, etc.) while rice and wheat would provide carbohydrates.  I'd give this whole part to the Japanese since they seem naturally inclined for handling these types of processes (just look at their products!).  My goal would be to create a greenhouse for these items.  Hopefully, you could expand the capabilities of such a thing to eventually produce O2 in the long term.<br />
<br />
Now that basic supplies are dealt with, the question then becomes what kind of things would you need for the base?  I already covered the solar farm and potential green house.  The long term goal would be to have a formal landing and launch pad.  A landing pad wouldn't be as necessary except as a formality for tourists/colonists.  But a launch pad obviously is the key to getting off that rock (not to mention the vehicle).  Much of my effort for the colony would be to establish three main goals:<br />
<ul>
    <li>Create a base that allows survival.</li>
    <li>Setup enough for future colonists and expansion.</li>
    <li>Quickly create something that will allow the return of people from Mars.</li>
</ul>
With this in mind, getting that launch pad up asap is huge.  Not to mention the return ship.  I'll get back to the return ship later.<br />
<br />
So after starting on the launch pad project, you still have to come up with other parts of the base.  I mean, you need living quarters, a kitchen, restroom facilities, wash, and maybe even a little entertainment.  When I think about the first ship that could land on Mars, I think big.  It'd have to contain enough room for the supplies and modules for survival for a few years.  Now the modules themselves don't have to be big.  They can be extensible.  I've seen some designs where tents or inflatable bases are established.  Don't know if that's the way to go as a result of the lack of protection from the sun's radiation as well as against the various forces on Mars' atmosphere.  Maybe something like thick, protective, inflatable cushions that contract for things like the living quarters, wash, etc.  Then you'd have an emergency protection zone in case some major sandstorm would hit.<br />
<br />
I think like the ISS, the initial station should be modular.  So just like the supplies being sent from Earth, you'd have these pieces of new modules being shipped every 3-6 months from various countries as contributions to the colony.  That way you can quickly hook up everything and create a kind of conduit-like system interconnecting the base between each other.  <br />
<br />
Personally, I think that once the science outpost gets established, you would need to quickly move people underground as colonies would get established.  At this point, the manufacturing plants I mentioned before would come into play as you'd need to create numerous living quarters.  I'd place people underground mostly for safety from the elements above.  Not sure if the ground can protect people better from radiation and other cosmic or toxic elements, but you definitely wouldn't be as exposed in theory.<br />
<br />
Anyway, I've gone on longer than I meant to.  Part of it is that my wonderful novel that I've not had enough time to work on is pretty much what I'm talking about.  But enjoy the sci-fi here being proposed!]]></description>
<pubDate>Fri, 07 Mar 2008 19:50:31 -0700</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.keithwatanabe.net/blogs/2008/3/7/54aed305d862110d186a85464a106f0b.html</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
