<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Keith's Web Blog RSS Feed</title>
<language>en-us</language>
<link>http://www.keithwatanabe.net/index.php</link>
<description>Keith Watanabe's Website</description>
<item>
<title>Flickr + Video = Another Redundant Yahoo Move?</title>
<link>http://www.keithwatanabe.net/blogs/2008/3/16/421e724bf4afaa8f5999e0f6a273a492.html</link>
<description><![CDATA[<strong>TechCrunch</strong> has a post about <strong>Flickr</strong> doing video.  I recently did a small report for my company and tracked some of the latest online video sites.  The number came out to be roughly 24-25 sites where people could upload content.  This was out of about 100 sites that I reviewed online.  Now, <strong>Flickr</strong> wants to enter a dense game.<br />
<br />
Certainly, <strong>Flickr</strong> can use their brand name and their user base along with some spiffy technology to add another dimension to their brand name.  However, this is the key point where I have a huge problem with <strong>Yahoo</strong>.  <strong>Yahoo</strong> already possesses a few video properties including <strong>Yahoo Live,</strong> <strong>Video</strong> and some of their partnerships to broadcast video via the Yahoo name.<br />
<br />
<em><strong>Adding video to Flickr seems to come into conflict with these ideas!</strong></em><br />
<br />
There was a letter sent out a while back regarding the numerous redundant properties that <strong>Yahoo</strong> has.  When <strong>Yahoo</strong> terminated <strong>Photos</strong>, I thought it was a great thing because they could utilize the better product of <strong>Flickr </strong>and eliminate brand conflicts (even though I ended up just ditching both entirely and moving to <a href="http://www.shareapic.net/ref.php?owner=conark">shareapic</a>).  Now, we might be seeing another situation where there's no brand unification, no vision of how to leverage the Yahoo brand with Flickr and vice versa.<br />
<br />
It seems, according to the post, that there might be an intent to differentiate it from <strong>YouTube</strong>.  Well, they have to certainly do more than differentiate itself from <strong>YouTube</strong>, but <strong>Yahoo's</strong> own <strong>Live</strong> and <strong>Video</strong> as well as the other 100 sites or so that have some form of video related content!<br />
<br />
If <strong>Flickr</strong> intends to move in this direction of adding video related content, my hope/advice to them is that they do not attempt to cross paths in the viral video space.  <strong>YouTube</strong> dominates and there are numerous other sites which already has the traffic and content available.  Video editing might be the way to go, but I would advise <strong>Yahoo</strong> to allow <strong>Flickr</strong> to be able to access content from their existing online video to create more of a themed cohesion between brands.  Call it &quot;Yahoo Media&quot; to not confuse users and to unify the products together.]]></description>
<pubDate>Sun, 16 Mar 2008 09:51:21 -0600</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.keithwatanabe.net/blogs/2008/3/16/421e724bf4afaa8f5999e0f6a273a492.html</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
