<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Keith's Web Blog RSS Feed</title>
<language>en-us</language>
<link>http://www.keithwatanabe.net/index.php</link>
<description>Keith Watanabe's Website</description>
<item>
<title>Nasty Bugs in Japan</title>
<link>http://www.keithwatanabe.net/blogs/2007/9/9/2456036147eb252f7852b704431ce8be.html</link>
<description><![CDATA[Anyone who knows me well realizes that I have a phobia of bugs of most sorts.  There I said it.  If I have a major pet peeve in Japan, it's that the bugs here are just freaky in nature.  You either have these oversized suckers or ultra speedy things.  I just decimated a spider that was able to easily hop several inches across even though it was just a tiny thing (compared to the roach in my apartment a few weeks ago).  The summer has to be the worst time of the year though.  You get these giant cockroaches, the loud, fat cicada, these horrific green beetle-like things, and even dragonflies that buzz around in a very annoying fashion.  I live on the second floor and in my backyard, there's an abundance of foliage.  I kept thinking if the friggin' owner would just cut this useless jungle, maybe it would solve some of these problems.  Also, if the stupid Midtown didn't put a friggin' pond that attracted all types of unwanted attention maybe we wouldn't have some of these freaks of nature.<br />
<br />
As I type this in anger, I keep seeing some stupid oyaji smiling at his garden, chuckling at some oversized roach prancing on his foot and a pigeon taking a shit on his cap since the guy just fed the thing a bunch of moldy bread crumbs.  For a polluted, filth soaked city, Tokyo has this bizarre mixture of the natural, which to me ends up just sucking and turning the landscape into a bigger shithole.]]></description>
<pubDate>Sun, 09 Sep 2007 00:41:02 -0600</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.keithwatanabe.net/blogs/2007/9/9/2456036147eb252f7852b704431ce8be.html</guid>
</item>
<item>
<title>Crappy Firefox/Prototype Bug</title>
<link>http://www.keithwatanabe.net/blogs/2007/10/13/bdfebbe853dae8856c306c974fd0b471.html</link>
<description><![CDATA[I just ran into a crappy Firefox/Prototype bug where headers larger than 10kb are dropped.  Other browsers work fine without this limitation (ironically).  It doesn't look like they'll fix this problem.  This really bites!<br />
<br />
Well, the solution if you're using prototype is the following.  First upgrade your prototype to 1.5.1+.  You might have to use the beta to get it working.  Next, do not send the JSON data structure as part of the response header from the server.  You have to send it as part of the body.  Use &quot;Content-Type: application/json&quot; as your header.  Then display your data structure.<br />
<br />
On the client side, you might have to modify your javascript if you're using Ajax.Request and utilize the convenience methods that automatically serialize JSON.  For instance, if you have a function that looks like:<br />
<br />
var ajax = new Ajax.Request(<br />
    url,<br />
    {<br />
        method: 'post', parameters: params, onComplet: someFunction<br />
    }<br />
);<br />
<br />
then in your function called someFunction, you probably will need to do something like:<br />
<br />
function someFunction(r)<br />
{<br />
    var json =  r.responseText.evalJSON();<br />
   // do something with the json data structure<br />
}<br />
<br />
i was using the other form of:<br />
<br />
function someFunction(r, json)<br />
<br />
so the inbound data structure wouldn't get passed if the size was too big.  this is a pain and hopefully they can address the convenience mode too.  but it was a real pain handling this.<br />
<br />
on a similar note, if you upgrade your prototype, you may also have to upgrade your scriptaculous javascript.  Additionally, I ran into a &quot;too much recursion&quot; type of error.  Geeze.]]></description>
<pubDate>Sat, 13 Oct 2007 19:30:52 -0600</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.keithwatanabe.net/blogs/2007/10/13/bdfebbe853dae8856c306c974fd0b471.html</guid>
</item>
<item>
<title>Note to Adobe: OPEN SOURCE FLASH YOU IDIOTS!!!!</title>
<link>http://www.keithwatanabe.net/blogs/2008/6/9/fb8d533f235411bff82a1d2ae6530d25.html</link>
<description><![CDATA[Okay, I've been going through numerous forums and it seems that my <strong>Flash</strong> woes can be purely pinpointed on <strong>Adobe</strong>.  The biggest complaints I've been reading are that <strong>Flash</strong> is not open source so developers have no chance to go in and fix the issue for <strong>Linux</strong>.  <strong>PulseAudio</strong> people, <strong>Firefox</strong> people, <strong>Ubuntu</strong> people, etc. are all pointing the finger at one point.  Well, if this is true, then <strong>Adobe</strong> should at the very least open source the <strong>Linux</strong> version of their plugin to the community.  I'm going to be forced to remove the <strong>flash plugin</strong> from my browser temporarily in case some stupid site in flash takes down my whole system.<br />
<br />
(Updated)<br />
<br />
In the meantime, I read that the new <strong>Flash Beta 10 plugin</strong> solves these problems.  I've linked the plugin here so you can get it.  Also, I believe you need to add <strong>libflashsupport</strong> using something like <strong>apt-get</strong> or <strong>synaptic</strong> for compatibility since there might still be some issues with <strong>PulseAudio</strong> and <strong>Flash</strong>.<br />
<br />
Funny how <strong>Adobe's</strong> Beta software works far better.  This isn't something new for me either.  But again, if they just open source their stuff I think these frustrations might go away....]]></description>
<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jun 2008 17:37:38 -0600</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.keithwatanabe.net/blogs/2008/6/9/fb8d533f235411bff82a1d2ae6530d25.html</guid>
</item>
<item>
<title>Avoid Ubuntu 8.04 Hardy!!!!</title>
<link>http://www.keithwatanabe.net/blogs/2008/6/15/3ee1f0d33b123c068b610b7e965f12ed.html</link>
<description><![CDATA[This distribution is REALLY bad.  I think the problem occurs with my desktop more than anything because my laptop seems to respond fine.  My guess at this point is that the NVIDIA card/driver is/are having unresolved issues with Hardy.  But thus far, this distribution seems quite hopeless.<br />
<br />
My biggest issues seem to come from Firefox usage and media files.  This is really bothersome since I use my desktop for internet browsing.  Now, I can't even trust it for that purpose.<br />
<br />
Anyway, this is really depressing since my Windows system seems more stable than my Linux desktop.  Heck, I have to hard reboot my system whenever it freezes.  I don't think the guys over at Ubuntu are going to be able to fix these issues anytime soon either.]]></description>
<pubDate>Sun, 15 Jun 2008 06:51:19 -0600</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.keithwatanabe.net/blogs/2008/6/15/3ee1f0d33b123c068b610b7e965f12ed.html</guid>
</item>
<item>
<title>More Facebook Issues</title>
<link>http://www.keithwatanabe.net/blogs/2008/11/12/1f717f4c2f69e6ee549b0e4902d1c3ac.html</link>
<description><![CDATA[I've been stubborn over the past few years regarding Facebook, but at the moment it is the best SNS for the purpose of friends and applications.  However, the issues keep rolling in.  Two new issues (bugs?) I've found are that AdBlock Plus ends up blocking the photo application and that after sending an email and pressing &quot;Okay&quot; a message will pop up saying you don't have sufficient privileges.<br />
<br />
The AdBlock Plus one is pretty annoying.  I haven't narrowed it down, but the gist of it is that one of the URLs that you click when attempting to access an enlarged photo causes the blocker to be activated.  Then your mouse icon will spin indefinitely.  Because I haven't figured out which url causes the issue as of yet, I just temporarily turn off AdBlock Plus when I want to see a picture.  But this is pretty annoying.  I don't know if this implies that the URL has been associated with some script that got flagged by the AdBlock Plus guys, but it's pretty damn annoying.<br />
<br />
The other bug is just plain stupid.  I don't know if AdBlock Plus also incurs this error, but I hope that Facebook takes a look into it.  I'm not getting paid by the hour.]]></description>
<pubDate>Wed, 12 Nov 2008 10:25:39 -0700</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.keithwatanabe.net/blogs/2008/11/12/1f717f4c2f69e6ee549b0e4902d1c3ac.html</guid>
</item>
<item>
<title>Yahoo Mail Officially Sucks Balls</title>
<link>http://www.keithwatanabe.net/blogs/2008/11/12/6b69ffc9cc268d0bf15ed07c81743620.html</link>
<description><![CDATA[In my growing discontent with Yahoo's services (overall), I've got a new complaint: Yahoo Mail.  Having been a user for a good number of years, I really do not feel motivated in switching my main account just on the basis that too many people contact me by the Yahoo email.  However, one thing has consistently irked me, especially recently: spam.  Before, the spam filtering wasn't so bad, but you could actually set some controllable rules.  Now, that option is no where to be found.<br />
<br />
But here's the killer: many LEGITIMATE email messages go TO the spam folder.<br />
<br />
It seems that if you don't have the email address entered into your contacts list, then there's a distinct chance Yahoo stupidly will consider an email for no good reason to be a spam email.  Combine that fact with how many spam messages STILL get through, then you've got a real shitty problem.<br />
<br />
Now, you might say, &quot;Well, it's a free service, you have no right to complain.&quot;<br />
<br />
Uh, I actually pay for my service.<br />
<br />
So I have EVERY right to complain.<br />
<br />
But this situation is becoming ridiculous and scary.  Recently, I missed a few legitimate email messages dealing with my moving situation.  Yahoo stupidly placed them into the spam folder and I didn't notice until now.<br />
<br />
So the spam folder is absolutely meaningless because now you're forced to look through each spam to ensure that the messages are legitimate.<br />
<br />
I honestly don't want to switch my email account to gmail (I have one account there), but I'm very tempted to do something to prevent this from happening again.<br />
<br />
If Yahoo's stock keeps plummeting, it's not because of the market.  It's because the people they hire are unmotivated and create crap that doesn't work.  I may not be the best programmer in the world, but given Yahoo's resources, money and position, you would think they could do better rather than be so fucking lazy about things.]]></description>
<pubDate>Wed, 12 Nov 2008 10:34:05 -0700</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.keithwatanabe.net/blogs/2008/11/12/6b69ffc9cc268d0bf15ed07c81743620.html</guid>
</item>
<item>
<title>Small Eclipse Android Bug</title>
<link>http://www.keithwatanabe.net/blogs/2008/11/29/8d90ab6ac90d01e25d05ff9d803a01bd.html</link>
<description><![CDATA[There's a small problem with the current Android Eclipse plugin installation documentation.  It says that you need to enter the URL for the site management part in Eclipse the following URL:<br />
<br />
https://dl-ssl.google.com/android/eclipse/<br />
<br />
But this URL doesn't exist.  Instead, you need to enter the following URL:<br />
<br />
http://dl-ssl.google.com/android/eclipse/<br />
<br />
In short, no https.]]></description>
<pubDate>Sat, 29 Nov 2008 10:42:25 -0700</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.keithwatanabe.net/blogs/2008/11/29/8d90ab6ac90d01e25d05ff9d803a01bd.html</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
